ArticleCureus2023
Gold-Induced Cytokine (GOLDIC®) Therapy in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autologous Growth Factor-Rich Concentrate (GFC) Injection in Non-union of Fractures: A Quasi-experimental Study.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Current Non-Surgical Curative Regenerative Therapies for Knee Osteoarthritis.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Gold-Induced Cytokine (GOLDIC) for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- GOLDIC Therapy Holds Promise as an Orthobiologic Agent: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2024Review
- Autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics: Different types and their effectiveness in managing knee osteoarthritis.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent treatment modalities for knee osteoarthritis (OA) provide symptomatic cures rather than reversing the pathology in the long term. An innovative regenerative therapy called "Gold Induced Cytokines" (GOLDIC®) was explored in various musculoskeletal diseases such as knee OA, lumbar canal stenosis, Achilles tendinopathy, and plantar fasciitis. In this study, we explored the safety and functional outcome of GOLDIC® injections in knee OA (KL grades 3 and 4) with visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. MATERIALS AND
methodsA multi-center open-label observational study was carried out after screening the cases according to the inclusion criteria. A total of 106 knees in 65 patients were enrolled for four doses of 4 ml of ultrasound-guided intra-articular GOLDIC® injections every three to six days. All cases were followed up with pre- and post-VAS and WOMAC scores at an interval of four weeks, three months, six months, and one year, and the complications (including severe adverse reactions) were monitored throughout.
resultsIn this study, 66.1% had grade 4 OA knee (without gross varus or subluxation) and 33.8% had grade 3 OA knee. All the participants underwent the GOLDIC® treatment modality. A statistically significant difference was observed in pre- and post-procedural follow-up in VAS and WOMAC scores at one-year follow-up. There were no recorded severe adverse reactions during the entire study period. Three patients failed the treatment in one year.
conclusionThe GOLDIC® procedure shows great promise as a novel method for treating moderate to severe OA of the knee, both in terms of pain and functional outcome without any severe adverse reactions, in a sustained manner and is worth exploring as a long-term treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.