Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37908856›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Exposure to, understanding of and interest in interventional radiology among Pakistani medical students: a cross-sectional study.

Muneeb Chattha, Muhammad Junaid Tahir, Ahmad Zia, Maha Chattha, Waleed Tariq, Muhammad Faiq Masood, Salman Sani, Zohaib Yousaf, Mohammed Mahmmoud Fadelallah Eljack, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Muneeb ChatthaDepartment of Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Junaid TahirDepartment of Radiology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center (PKLI & RC), Lahore, Pakistan.
Ahmad ZiaDepartment of Radiology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Center (PKLI & RC), Lahore, Pakistan.
Maha ChatthaDepartment of Radiology, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Waleed TariqDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Faiq MasoodDepartment of Surgery, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Salman SaniDepartment of Medicine, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan.
Zohaib YousafDepartment of Medicine, Tower Health, Reading, PA, United States.
Mohammed Mahmmoud Fadelallah EljackDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Bakht Alruda, Ad Duwaym, Sudan.
Muhammad Sohaib AsgharDepartment of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Medical students need more awareness regarding minimally invasive image-guided procedures carried out by interventional radiological approach. This study analyzed the knowledge and attitudes of medical students regarding interventional radiology (IR) and the factors influencing their decision to choose IR as a specialty in the future. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based study was conducted among medical students across Pakistan. The data were collected from October 14, 2021, to November 14, 2021. The questionnaire included demographic variables, exposure, interest, and self-reported knowledge of IR, interventions, instruments utilized in IR, and the responsibilities of the interventional radiologist. Variables affecting the possible choice of IR as a future career were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results: The median age was 22 years, with a male predominance. 65.5% exhibited an interest in radiology, and 20.2% in IR. The majority, 83.5%, perceived IR. As having good to adequate prospects. Male participants preferred IR more as compared to females. Participants willing to attend IR rotation and had an excellent view of IR as a specialty had higher propensity towards IR as a future career than their counterparts. The majority opted for IR as a better-paying job with lots of intellectual stimulation and career flexibility. Conclusion: IR is a demanding specialty with rigorous routines but reasonable monetary compensation. Lack of infrastructure and low numbers of trained specialists limit medical students' exposure to IR in developing health economies like Pakistan. Clinical rotations in IR departments would help raise awareness about the field and bridging this gap.

Indexed as

awarenessfuture careerknowledgemedical specialtyradiology

Identifiers

PMID37908856
PMCPMC10615072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.