Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37908778›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2023

Informed Consent for Spine Procedures: Best Practice Guideline from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).

Timothy Deer, Ankur A Patel, Dawood Sayed, Ashley Bailey-Classen, Ashley Comer, Benjamin Gill, Kiran Patel, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Natalie Strand, Jonathan M Hagedorn and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy DeerThe Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8907-7730
Ankur A PatelWeill Cornell Tri-Institutional Pain Medicine Program, Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5609-3467
Dawood SayedDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8867-2140
Ashley Bailey-ClassenTrinity Pain Medicine Associates, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Ashley ComerThe Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
Benjamin GillDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Kiran PatelLenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Natalie StrandInterventional Pain Management, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9489-2550
Jonathan M HagedornDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1039-8166
Zohra HussainiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, the University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0608-4853
Nasir KhatriNovant Health Spine Specialists, Charlotte, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-2294
Ryan BudwanyThe Spine and Nerve Center of the Virginias, Charleston, WV, USA.
Melissa MurphyNorth Texas Orthopedics and Spine Center, Grapevine, TX, USA.
Dan NguyenNeuroradiology and Pain Solutions of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Vwaire OrhurhuDepartment of Anesthesia, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Susquehanna, PA, USA.
Morteza RabiiCrimson Pain Management, Overland Park, Kansas, KS, USA.
Douglas BeallComprehensive Specialty Care, Edmond, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8340-696X
Stephen HochschulerTexas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.
Michael E SchatmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1019-0413
Timothy LubenowDepartment of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2938-9684
Richard GuyerTexas Back Institute, Plano, TX, USA.
Ahmed M RaslanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
The Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USTexas Back Institute · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USCornell University · USNew York University · USNorthwell Health · USNovant Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USPain Management Institute · USRush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The evolution of treatment options for painful spinal disorders in diverse settings has produced a variety of approaches to patient care among clinicians from multiple professional backgrounds. The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practice group identified a need for a multidisciplinary guideline regarding appropriate and effective informed consent processes for spine procedures. Objective: The ASPN Informed Consent Guideline was developed to provide clinicians with a comprehensive evaluation of patient consent practices during the treatment of spine pathology. Methods: After a needs assessment, ASPN determined that best practice regarding proper informed consent for spinal procedures was needed and a process of selecting faculty was developed based on expertise, diversity, and knowledge of the subject matter. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and when appropriate, evidence grading was performed. Recommendations were based on evidence when available, and when limited, based on consensus opinion. Results: Following a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Informed Consent Guideline group rated the literature to assist with specification of best practice regarding patient consent during the management of spine disorders. Conclusion: Careful attention to informed consent is critical in achieving an optimal outcome and properly educating patients. This process involves a discussion of risks, advantages, and alternatives to treatment. As the field of interventional pain and spine continues to grow, it is imperative that clinicians effectively educate patients and obtain comprehensive informed consent for invasive procedures. This consent should be tailored to the patient's specific needs to ensure an essential recognition of patient autonomy and reasonable expectations of treatment.

Indexed as

best practiceclinical guidelineinformed consentpain medicinespine interventionspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID37908778
PMCPMC10613566
OpenAlexW4387898392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.