Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37908707›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2023

Identifying treatment non-responders based on pre-treatment gait characteristics - A machine learning approach.

Rosa M S Visscher, Julia Murer, Fatemeh Fahimi, Elke Viehweger, William R Taylor, Reinald Brunner, Navrag B Singh

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosa M S VisscherLaboratory for Movement Biomechanics, Institute for Biomechanics, Department of Health Science & Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Julia MurerLaboratory for Movement Biomechanics, Institute for Biomechanics, Department of Health Science & Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Fatemeh FahimiLaboratory for Movement Biomechanics, Institute for Biomechanics, Department of Health Science & Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Elke ViehwegerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
William R TaylorLaboratory for Movement Biomechanics, Institute for Biomechanics, Department of Health Science & Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Reinald BrunnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Navrag B SinghLaboratory for Movement Biomechanics, Institute for Biomechanics, Department of Health Science & Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Paediatric movement disorders such as cerebral palsy often negatively impact walking behaviour. Although clinical gait analysis is usually performed to guide therapy decisions, not all respond positively to their assigned treatment. Identifying these individuals based on their pre-treatment characteristics could guide clinicians towards more appropriate and personalized interventions. Using routinely collected pre-treatment gait and anthropometric features, we aimed to assess whether standard machine learning approaches can be effective in identifying patients at risk of negative treatment outcomes. Methods: Observational data of 119 patients with movement disorders were retrospectively extracted from a local clinical database, comprising sagittal joint angles and spatiotemporal parameters, derived from motion capture data pre- and post-treatment (physiotherapy, orthosis, botulin toxin injections, or surgery). Participants were labelled based on their change in gait profile score (GPS, non-responders with a decline in GPS of <1.6° vs. responders). Their pre-treatment features (sagittal joint angles, spatiotemporal parameters, anthropometrics) were used to train a support vector machine classifier with 5-fold cross-validation and Bayesian optimization within a MATLAB-based Classification Learner App. Results: An average accuracy of 88.2 ± 0.5 % was achieved for identifying participants whose gait will not respond to treatment, with 64 % true negative rate and an area under the curve of 88 %. Conclusion: Overall, a classical machine learning model was able to identify patients at risk of not responding to treatment, based on gait features and anthropometrics collected prior to treatment. The output of such a model could function as a warning signal, notifying clinicians that a certain individual might not respond well to the standard of care and that a more personalized intervention might be needed.

Indexed as

Cerebral palsyClinical gait analysisMachine learningTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID37908707
PMCPMC10613900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.