Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37908595›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Degeneracy and disordered brain networks in psychiatric patients using multivariate structural covariance analyzes.

Rositsa Paunova, Cristina Ramponi, Sevdalina Kandilarova, Anna Todeva-Radneva, Adeliya Latypova, Drozdstoy Stoyanov, Ferath Kherif

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rositsa PaunovaDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Medical University Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Cristina RamponiLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sevdalina KandilarovaDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Medical University Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Anna Todeva-RadnevaDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Medical University Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Adeliya LatypovaLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Drozdstoy StoyanovDepartment of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Medical University Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Ferath KherifLaboratory for Research in Neuroimaging, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Medical University Plovdiv · BGUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we applied multivariate methods to identify brain regions that have a critical role in shaping the connectivity patterns of networks associated with major psychiatric diagnoses, including schizophrenia (SCH), major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls (HC). We used T1w images from 164 subjects: Schizophrenia ( Methods: We extracted regions of interest (ROIs) using a method based on the SHOOT algorithm of the SPM12 toolbox. We then performed multivariate structural covariance between the groups. For the regions identified as significant in t term of their covariance value, we calculated their eigencentrality as a measure of the influence of brain regions within the network. We applied a significance threshold of p = 0.001. Finally, we performed a cluster analysis to determine groups of regions that had similar eigencentrality profiles in different pairwise comparison networks in the observed groups. Results: As a result, we obtained 4 clusters with different brain regions that were diagnosis-specific. Cluster 1 showed the strongest discriminative values between SCH and HC and SCH and BD. Cluster 2 had the strongest discriminative value for the MDD patients, cluster 3 - for the BD patients. Cluster 4 seemed to contribute almost equally to the discrimination between the four groups. Discussion: Our results suggest that we can use the multivariate structural covariance method to identify specific regions that have higher predictive value for specific psychiatric diagnoses. In our research, we have identified brain signatures that suggest that degeneracy shapes brain networks in different ways both within and across major psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

bipolar disordermajor depressive disorderneuroimagingschizophreniastructural covariance

Identifiers

PMID37908595
PMCPMC10614636
OpenAlexW4387604780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.