ArticleJCEM case reports2023
Massive Biochemically Silent Pheochromocytoma Masquerading as Nonfunctioning Adrenocortical Cancer.
Article in JCEM case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pheochromocytoma Across the Perioperative Course: Current Concepts and Clinical Management.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Two Cases of Composite Pheochromocytoma-Ganglioneuromas With Plasma Metanephrine Levels in the Subclinical Range Pheochromocytoma-Ganglioneuroma.AACE clinical case reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pheochromocytomas are rare catecholamine-secreting neuroendocrine tumors of the adrenal medulla chromaffin cells, usually associated with features of catecholamine excess. Clinically and biochemically silent pheochromocytoma without adrenergic symptoms or elevated catecholamine concentrations are rare. A 71-year-old female presented with acute right flank pain with abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealing a hemorrhagic right adrenal mass. She had no preceding adrenergic symptoms, and normal serum electrolytes, on a background of well-controlled hypertension on amlodipine monotherapy. After conservative management and discharge, an outpatient CT adrenal scan confirmed an 88 × 64 mm right adrenal mass demonstrating intense avidity (maximum standardized uptake value, 20.2) on fluorodeoxyglucose F 18-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT scan. Biochemical screening supported a nonfunctional adrenal lesion with normal-range plasma normetanephrines and metanephrines. She underwent a right adrenalectomy for presumed nonfunctioning adrenocortical cancer; however, histopathology demonstrated a 120-mm pheochromocytoma. Succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) and fumarate hydratase (FH) staining were retained; however, weakly positive 2SC staining raised concerns for FH-deficient pheochromocytoma. Germline DNA sequencing was negative for pathogenic RET, VHL, SDHB, SDHD, or FH variants. Tumor cells stained positive for tyrosine hydroxylase and negative for dopamine β hydroxylase. Four months postoperatively, progress FDG-PET/CT scan demonstrated no focal avidity. Massive biochemically silent pheochromocytomas are exceedingly rare, and we discuss various mechanisms that may predispose patients to this phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.