ArticleJCEM case reports2023
A Case of Lymphocytic Infundibulo-neurohypophysitis Exhibiting Spontaneous Regression.
Article in JCEM case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case of Epstein-Barr virus- associated lymphocytic infundibulo-neurohypophysitis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Lymphocytic Hypophysitis Presenting as Acute-onset Arginine Vasopressin Deficiency and Pituitary Stalk Thickening: A Case Report.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphocytic infundibulo-neurohypophysitis (LINH) is a rare autoimmune inflammatory process that selectively affects the neurohypophysis and the pituitary stalk, typically presenting with central diabetes insipidus (CDI). LINH is considered underdiagnosed because the definitive diagnosis requires invasive pituitary surgery with a high risk of complications. We present a case of CDI resulting from LINH, which was treated with conservative management, eschewing both glucocorticoid treatment and pituitary surgery. At presentation, the hormonal assessment indicated the presence of CDI without anterior pituitary dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed stalk thickening without a posterior pituitary bright spot, and anti-rabphilin-3A antibodies were positive in serum. Collectively, we made a diagnosis of LINH. Considering that the patient did not exhibit any symptoms of mass effect, we chose conservative treatment with desmopressin acetate. One year later, the stalk thickening regressed spontaneously without surgical or glucocorticoid treatment, although the posterior pituitary bright spot remained absent, and CDI did not improve. The inflammatory process of LINH is mostly self-limited and recovers spontaneously, whereas life-long desmopressin treatment may be required because of pituitary stalk fibrosis and atrophy. Our case highlights the importance of noninvasive diagnosis and careful follow-up in preventing unnecessary interventions for patients with LINH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.