ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2023
Noninvasive Point of Care Device for Assessing Cardiac Response to Acute Volume Changes.
Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The change in the amplitude of a peripheral pulse in response to a Valsalva maneuver has diagnostic utility for assessing volume status at the bedside. We have developed a device to automatically quantify the Valsalva pulse response (VPR) to a standardized Valsalva maneuver that the device guides a user to perform. In this study, we sought to determine whether VPR by the device, Indicor, is sensitive enough to detect the acute increase in central pressure and volume load that occurs with a passive leg raise (PLR) in healthy volunteers. Methods: Healthy volunteers were tested semirecumbently at 45 degrees, then again after being leaned back on a pivoted wedge with legs raised at 45 degrees and torso and head flat, and then again in the semirecumbent position. The device recorded a finger photoplethysmography (PPG) signal during a 10-second expiratory effort of 20 mmHg as guided by the device. VPR was automatically calculated as the ratio of the end-Valsalva pulse amplitude to the baseline pulse amplitude. Results: In the 30 participants who completed testing, VPR increased from baseline to PLR in every participant, from 0.34 ± 0.13 to 0.60 ± 0.14 (p < 0.0001). Back upright, VPR decreased back to 0.33 ± 0.10 (p < 0.0001 versus PLR; NS versus baseline position). Conclusion: In this proof-of-concept study of healthy participants, the Indicor device, a noninvasive, convenient device that automatically calculates VPR from a finger photoplethysmography signal during a standardized Valsalva maneuver, was sensitive enough to detect the increase in VPR that occurred with an acute central volume load from a PLR. Future studies should examine whether VPR responds differently to a PLR in heart failure patients with abnormal cardiac performance and/or congestion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.