Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37908424›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2023

Central Venous Catheter Insertion for Vascular Access: A 6-year Single-center Experience.

Merve Misirlioglu, Dincer Yildizdas, Damla Pinar Yavas, Faruk Ekinci, Ozden Ozgur Horoz, Ahmet Yontem

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pitfalls in internal jugular vein cannulation.World journal of clinical cases · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Merve MisirliogluDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-841X
Dincer YildizdasDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-5108
Damla Pinar YavasDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0424-4155
Faruk EkinciDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6675-3150
Ozden Ozgur HorozDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7590-650X
Ahmet YontemDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9982-0310
Cukurova University · TRMersin Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Central venous catheterization is performed for such reasons as hemodynamic monitoring, parenteral nutrition, drug and fluid administration, and extracorporeal treatment. This study aimed to retrospectively review the indications for central venous catheter (CVC) insertion for vascular access and removal by pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) physicians, catheter types, and catheter-associated complications. Materials and methods: The indications for CVC insertion and removal, catheter insertion site, types of catheters, catheter-associated complications, whether or not insertion was ultrasonographically guided, catheter-associated infections, and duration of use of 1200 catheters used by PICU physicians between 2015 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: In all, 315 (26.3%) hemodialysis catheters and 885 (73.8%) CVCs were inserted. Mean duration of catheter use was 12.33 ± 7.28 days. CVCs were inserted most commonly (28.4% [ Conclusion: Central venous catheterization is becoming more widespread because of the benefits it provides during the follow-up and treatment of children. As central venous catheterization is a more invasive procedure than peripheral localization and is associated with severe complications, especially in pediatric patients, it should be carefully performed under sterile conditions and by experienced personnel based on appropriate indications. Central venous catheters should be removed as soon as the need disappears. How to cite this article: Misirlioglu M, Yildizdas D, Yavas DP, Ekinci F, Horoz OO, Yontem A. Central Venous Catheter Insertion for Vascular Access: A 6-year Single-center Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(10):748-753.

Indexed as

CatheterizationChildIntensive careUltrasonographyVascular access

Identifiers

PMID37908424
PMCPMC10613870
OpenAlexW4387217939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.