Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37908227›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2023

Comprehensive clinical assays for molecular diagnostics of gliomas: the current state and future prospects.

Alina Penkova, Olga Kuziakova, Valeriia Gulaia, Vladlena Tiasto, Nikolay V Goncharov, Daria Lanskikh, Valeriia Zhmenia, Ivan Baklanov, Vladislav Farniev, Vadim Kumeiko

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multi-Omics Integration for Advancing Glioma Precision Medicine.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Advances in 2D materials for wearable biomonitoring.Materials science & engineering. R, Reports : a review journal · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alina PenkovaInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Olga KuziakovaInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Valeriia GulaiaInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Vladlena TiastoInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Nikolay V GoncharovInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Daria LanskikhInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Valeriia ZhmeniaInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Ivan BaklanovInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Vladislav FarnievInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Vadim KumeikoInstitute of Life Sciences and Biomedicine, Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia.
Far Eastern Federal University · RUA.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Center of Marine Biology Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RUFar Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioma is one of the most intractable types of cancer, due to delayed diagnosis at advanced stages. The clinical symptoms of glioma are unclear and due to a variety of glioma subtypes, available low-invasive testing is not effective enough to be introduced into routine medical laboratory practice. Therefore, recent advances in the clinical diagnosis of glioma have focused on liquid biopsy approaches that utilize a wide range of techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Among all techniques, NGS is the most advantageous diagnostic method. Despite the rapid cheapening of NGS experiments, the cost of such diagnostics remains high. Moreover, high-throughput diagnostics are not appropriate for molecular profiling of gliomas since patients with gliomas exhibit only a few diagnostic markers. In this review, we highlighted all available assays for glioma diagnosing for main pathogenic glioma DNA sequence alterations. In the present study, we reviewed the possibility of integrating routine molecular methods into the diagnosis of gliomas. We state that the development of an affordable assay covering all glioma genetic aberrations could enable early detection and improve patient outcomes. Moreover, the development of such molecular diagnostic kits could potentially be a good alternative to expensive NGS-based approaches.

Indexed as

cancer molecular diagnosticsmedical marketmolecular markers of gliomaNGS panelPCR

Identifiers

PMID37908227
PMCPMC10613994
OpenAlexW4387671695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.