Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907973›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2023

Postpartum family planning uptake and its associated factors among postpartum women in Asosa zone, Benishangul Gumuz regional state, Ethiopia: a facility-based cross-sectional study.

Rut Oljira, Temesgen Tilahun, Gashaw Tiruneh, Tariku Tesfaye Bekuma, Motuma Getachew, Assefa Seme, Ayantu Getahun, Lemane Dereje, Alemnesh Mosisa, Ebisa Turi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rut OljiraDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Temesgen TilahunDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia. ttamuko@yahoo.com.
Gashaw TirunehDepartment of Public Health, College of Health sciences, Asosa University, Asossa, Ethiopia.
Tariku Tesfaye BekumaDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Motuma GetachewDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Assefa SemeDepartment of Reproductive Health and Health Service Management, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ayantu GetahunDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Lemane DerejeDepartment of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Alemnesh MosisaDepartment of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Ebisa TuriDepartment of Public Health, Institute of Health Sciences, Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia.
Wollega University · ETAddis Ababa University · ETAsossa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe first twelve months after a woman has given birth is crucial for the use of contraceptives to prevent unintended pregnancy. Most women, especially in developing countries, do not realize that they are at risk for pregnancy during this period. Due to this, contraceptive use by women is ignored at this time.

objectiveThis study assessed the associated factors of postpartum family planning (PPFP) service uptake in the Asosa zone.

methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 396 postpartum women in the Asosa zone. An interviewer-administered, structured, and pre-tested questionnaire was used to collect data. Data entry and cleaning were done using Epi Info version 7.0 and analyzed using SPSS version 25 software. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with postpartum family planning uptake.

resultsThe majority of the study participants, 384 (97.2%), had heard about at least one method of family planning. Nearly two-thirds of the study participants (64.1%) had resumed sexual intercourse. Only 53.5% of the participants started using PPFP. Injectable forms (54.7%) and implants (26.4%) were the most commonly used methods. More than one-fourth (27.4%) did not use their preferred methods. Family planning use before index pregnancy (AOR = 4.8, 95% CI: 2.65, 8.82), previous use of PPFP (AOR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.33, 4.38)] and health facility delivery (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.46, 5.49)] were significantly associated with uptake of postpartum family planning. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: Postpartum family planning uptake in the study area was low. Uptake of PPFP was correlated with prior family planning usage and delivery at a healthcare facility. Given these factors, we recommend all study area stakeholders to promote family planning use among women of reproductive age and to encourage deliveries at healthcare facilities. Designing a method to reach women who give birth at home for a variety of reasons is also advisable. Unavailability of different forms of FP also made the participants not use the preferred option. Therefore, we recommend the stakeholders in the study area to avail variety of FP methods.

Indexed as

Asosa ZoneAssociated factorsBenishangul GumuzPostpartum family planningPPFP uptake

Identifiers

PMID37907973
PMCPMC10619311
OpenAlexW4388071965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.