Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907957›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2023

Lessons learnt while designing and conducting a longitudinal study from the first Italian COVID-19 pandemic wave up to 3 years.

Alvisa Palese, Stefania Chiappinotto, Federico Fonda, Erica Visintini, Maddalena Peghin, Marco Colizzi, Matteo Balestrieri, Maria De Martino, Miriam Isola, Carlo Tascini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy. alvisa.palese@uniud.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3508-844X
Stefania ChiappinottoDepartment of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Federico FondaDepartment of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Erica VisintiniDepartment of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Maddalena PeghinInfectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria-ASST-Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Marco ColizziUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Matteo BalestrieriUnit of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Maria De MartinoMedical Statistics Division, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Miriam IsolaMedical Statistics Division, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Carlo TasciniInfectious Diseases Division, Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral scientific contributions have summarized the "lessons learnt" during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but only a few authors have discussed what we have learnt on how to design and conduct research during a pandemic. The main intent of this study was to summarize the lessons learnt by an Italian multidisciplinary research group that developed and conducted a longitudinal study on COVID-19 patients infected during the first wave in March 2020 and followed-up for 3 years.

methodsA qualitative research approach embedded into the primary CORonavirus MOnitoRing study (CORMOR) study was developed, according to the the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. Multiple data collection strategies were performed: each member was invited to report the main lessons learnt according to his/her perspective and experience from the study design throughout its conduction. The narratives collected were summarized and discussed in face-to-face rounds. The narratives were then thematically analysed according to their main topic in a list that was resent to all members to check the content and their organization. The list of the final "lessons learnt" has been agreed by all members, as described in a detailed fashion.

resultsSeveral lessons were learnt while designing and conducting a longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic and summarised into ten main themes: some are methodological, while others concern how to conduct research in pandemics/epidemics/infectious disease emergencies.

conclusionsThe multidisciplinary approach, which also included patients' perspective, helped us to protect the consistency and quality of the research provided in pandemic times. The lesson learnt suggest that our research approach may benefit from changes in education, clinical practice and policies.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsData CollectionFemaleHumansLearningLongitudinal StudiesMaleCOVID-19Lessons learnedLongitudinal studyResearch design

Identifiers

PMID37907957
PMCPMC10617212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.