Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907849›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2023

Comparison of the clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (B.1.1.529) infected patients from a single hospitalist service.

N Radhakrishnan, M Liu, B Idowu, A Bansari, K Rathi, S Magar, L Mundhra, J Sarmiento, U Ghaffar, J Kattan and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N Radhakrishnan *Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
M Liu *Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
B IdowuDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
A BansariDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
K RathiDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
S MagarDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
L MundhraDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
J SarmientoDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
U GhaffarDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
J KattanDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
R JonesDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
J GeorgeDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA.
Y YangDepartment of Statistics, Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, University of Georgia, 310 Herty Drive, Athens, GA, 30602, Greece. yy70876@uga.edu.
F SouthwickDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, 6362 NW 41st Ave, Gainesville, FL, 32606, USA. southf@epi.ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile existing evidence suggests less severe clinical manifestations and lower mortality are associated with the Omicron variant as compared to the Delta variant. However, these studies fail to control for differences in health systems facilities and providers. By comparing patients hospitalized on a single medical service during the Delta and Omicron surges we were able to conduct a more accurate comparison of the two varaints' clinical manifestations and outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a prospective study of 364 Omicron (BA.1) infected patients on a single hospitalist service and compared these findings to a retrospective analysis of 241 Delta variant infected patients managed on the same service. We examined differences in symptoms, laboratory measures, and clinical severity between the two variants and assessed potential risk drivers for case mortality.

findingsPatients infected with Omicron were older and had more underlying medical conditions increasing their risk of death. Although they were less severely ill and required less supplemental oxygen and dexamethasone, in-hospital mortality was similar to Delta cases, 7.14% vs. 4.98% for Delta (q-value = 0.38). Patients older than 60 years or with immunocompromised conditions had much higher risk of death during hospitalization, with estimated odds ratios of 17.46 (95% CI: 5.05, 110.51) and 2.80 (1.03, 7.08) respectively. Neither vaccine history nor variant type played a significant role in case fatality. The Rothman score, NEWS-2 score, level of neutrophils, level of care, age, and creatinine level at admission were highly predictive of in-hospital death.

interpretationIn hospitalized patients, the Omicron variant is less virulent than the Delta variant but is associated with a comparable mortality. Clinical and laboratory features at admission are informative about the risk of death.

Indexed as

COVID-19HospitalistsHospital MortalityHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Clinical manifestationsCOVID-19Delta variantMortalityOmicron variantSARS-CoV-2Virulence

Identifiers

PMID37907849
PMCPMC10617227
OpenAlexW4388070159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.