ArticleBMC medical imaging2023
Predictive value of Dmax and %ΔSUVmax of
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The prognostic role of maximum tumor dissemination derived by PET/CT in oncological diseases: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Prognostic value of TMTV and Dmax calculated fromEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- A Lesion-adaptive Segmentation Approach for Tumor Delineation on FDG PET/CT in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Patients.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Added prognostic value of baseline pre-infusionScientific reports · 2025Article
- Inter-reader agreement of quantitative FDG PET/CT biomarkers in lymphoma: a multicentre evaluation of MTV, TLG and Dmax.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Baseline [BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Semiquantitative 2-[Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the prognosis value of a combined model based on
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the PET metabolic parameters and clinical data of 154 DLBCL patients between December 2015 and October 2020. All of these patients underwent
resultsOf 154 patients, 35 exhibited disease progression or recurrence. ROC analysis revealed that baseline
conclusionThe combined model of baseline parameter Dmax and intermediate parameter %ΔSUVmax of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.