Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907818›Full record

ArticleOdontology2024

Second mesiobuccal canal segmentation with YOLOv5 architecture using cone beam computed tomography images.

Şuayip Burak Duman, Duygu Çelik Özen, Ibrahim Şevki Bayrakdar, Oğuzhan Baydar, Elham S Abu Alhaija, Dilek Helvacioğlu Yiğit, Özer Çelik, Rohan Jagtap, Roberta Pileggi, Kaan Orhan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Endodontics.Journal of dental research · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Şuayip Burak DumanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University Malatya, Malatya, Turkey. suayipburakduman@gmail.com.
Duygu Çelik ÖzenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University Malatya, Malatya, Turkey.
Ibrahim Şevki BayrakdarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Oğuzhan BaydarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ege University İzmir, İzmir, Turkey.
Elham S Abu AlhaijaCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Dilek Helvacioğlu YiğitCollege of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Özer ÇelikDepartment of Mathematics-Computer, Faculty of Science, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Rohan JagtapDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Care Planning and Restorative Sciences, Medical Center School of Dentistry, University of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, USA.
Roberta PileggiDepartment of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Florida, USA.
Kaan OrhanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Eskişehir Osmangazi University · TRInonu University · TRQatar University · QAAnkara University · TREge University · TRUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

Eskisehir Osmangazi University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit 202045E06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to use a deep-learning model based on CNN architecture to detect the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals, which are seen as a variation in maxillary molars root canals. In the current study, 922 axial sections from 153 patients' cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were used. The segmentation method was employed to identify the MB2 canals in maxillary molars that had not previously had endodontic treatment. Labeled images were divided into training (80%), validation (10%) and testing (10%) groups. The artificial intelligence (AI) model was trained using the You Only Look Once v5 (YOLOv5x) architecture with 500 epochs and a learning rate of 0.01. Confusion matrix and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were used in the statistical evaluation of the results. The sensitivity of the MB2 canal segmentation model was 0.92, the precision was 0.83, and the F1 score value was 0.87. The area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC graph of the model was 0.84. The mAP value at 0.5 inter-over union (IoU) was found as 0.88. The deep-learning algorithm used showed a high success in the detection of the MB2 canal. The success of the endodontic treatment can be increased and clinicians' time can be preserved using the newly created artificial intelligence-based models to identify variations in root canal anatomy before the treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDental Pulp CavityCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMaxillaTooth RootCone beam computed tomographyDeep learningSecond mesiobuccal canalsYOLO

Identifiers

PMID37907818
OpenAlexW4388048823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.