ReviewNano-micro letters2023
Intelligent Vascularized 3D/4D/5D/6D-Printed Tissue Scaffolds.
Review in Nano-micro letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- High Internal Phase Pickering Emulsions as Structurally Tunable Bioinks for Extrusion-Based Printing From 3D Fabrication to Adaptive Multiresponsive Architectures.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Pooled it
- From blueprint to build: Metal ions in peripheral nerve development and engineering regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- NIR-II photothermal-driven pulsatile PTH release for osteoporotic bone repair.National science review · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Enabled Biomaterials for Controlled Drug Delivery in Implantable and Wearable Devices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Additive Manufacturing for Extracellular Vesicle Therapeutics: Engineering Strategies for Production, Isolation, and Delivery.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Silk Fibroin-Modified Titanium Implants for Bone Tissue Engineering: Structural Basis, Functionalization and Composite Strategies.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Review
- Electrical stimulation as an emerging strategy in bone repair: Mechanisms, applications, and advances.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Highly Biomimetic Ectodermal Epithelial Organoids for Epithelial Barrier Stimulation Assays.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- An Overview of Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Strategies for 3D-Printed Bioengineered Vascular Stents: Toward Next-Generation Drug Delivery Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Shaping Function: Polymeric 3D Systems With Unconventional Geometries for Biomedical Applications.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- 4D printed hydrogel scaffolds with shape morphing by near-infrared to promote bone regeneration through immune and vascular coupling.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Synergistic 3D-bioprinted scaffold with multi-level adaptability for vascularized bone regeneration via osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Harnessing polysaccharide-mediated biomineralization for advanced bone tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Microengineering the Liver: Strategies for Constructing Functional Liver-on-a-Chip Devices.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2026Review
- Toward 4D printed functional soft tissues.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Eco-Friendly, Multi-Mode Processable Highly Moldable Wood Enabled by the Reconstruction of Hydrogen-Bonding Domain.Nano-micro letters · 2026Article
- Sculpting the Future of Bone: The Evolution of Absorbable Materials in Orthopedics.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Review
- Fibrin scaffolds for angiogenesis in soft tissue models: a systematic review.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Rational Design and Functionalization of Melt Electrowritten 4D Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Smart biomaterials for cardiovascular, bone, and skin tissue engineering: mechanisms, applications, and future prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood vessels are essential for nutrient and oxygen delivery and waste removal. Scaffold-repairing materials with functional vascular networks are widely used in bone tissue engineering. Additive manufacturing is a manufacturing technology that creates three-dimensional solids by stacking substances layer by layer, mainly including but not limited to 3D printing, but also 4D printing, 5D printing and 6D printing. It can be effectively combined with vascularization to meet the needs of vascularized tissue scaffolds by precisely tuning the mechanical structure and biological properties of smart vascular scaffolds. Herein, the development of neovascularization to vascularization to bone tissue engineering is systematically discussed in terms of the importance of vascularization to the tissue. Additionally, the research progress and future prospects of vascularized 3D printed scaffold materials are highlighted and presented in four categories: functional vascularized 3D printed scaffolds, cell-based vascularized 3D printed scaffolds, vascularized 3D printed scaffolds loaded with specific carriers and bionic vascularized 3D printed scaffolds. Finally, a brief review of vascularized additive manufacturing-tissue scaffolds in related tissues such as the vascular tissue engineering, cardiovascular system, skeletal muscle, soft tissue and a discussion of the challenges and development efforts leading to significant advances in intelligent vascularized tissue regeneration is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.