ArticleDysphagia2024
Using ChatGPT to Generate Research Ideas in Dysphagia: A Pilot Study.
Article in Dysphagia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ChatGPT assisted generation of systematic review ideas in urooncology.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Applications and Future Perspectives of Large Language Models in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A Comprehensive Survey.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2025Review
- Current Technological Advances in Dysphagia Screening: Systematic Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Exploring the Ability of ChatGPT to Act as a Research Aid in Otolaryngology.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- A framework for human evaluation of large language models in healthcare derived from literature review.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current research in dysphagia faces challenges due to the rapid growth of scientific literature and the interdisciplinary nature of the field. To address this, the study evaluates ChatGPT, an AI language model, as a supplementary resource to assist clinicians and researchers in generating research ideas for dysphagia, utilizing recent advancements in natural language processing and machine learning. The research ideas were generated through ChatGPT's command to explore diverse aspects of dysphagia. A web-based survey was conducted, 45 dysphagia experts were asked to rank each study on a scale of 1 to 5 according to feasibility, novelty, clinical implications, and relevance to current practice. A total of 26 experts (58%) completed the survey. The mean (± sd) rankings of research ideas were 4.03 (± 0.17) for feasibility, 3.5 (± 0.17) for potential impact on the field, 3.84 (± 0.12) for clinical relevance, and 3.08 (± 0.36) for novelty and innovation. Results of this study suggest that ChatGPT offers a promising approach to generating research ideas in dysphagia. While its current capability to generate innovative ideas appears limited, it can serve as a supplementary resource for researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37907728What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.