Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907684›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

Radiomics analysis based on single phase and different phase combinations of radiomics features from tri-phasic CT to distinguish renal oncocytoma from chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Suping Yang, Yuanxi Jian, Fan Yang, Rui Liu, Wenqing Zhang, Jiaping Wang, Xin Tan, Junlin Wu, Yuan Chen, Xiaowen Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Suping Yang *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yuanxi Jian *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China. 13988822554@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3802-9752
Fan YangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Rui LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Wenqing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Jiaping WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xin TanDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Junlin WuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yuan ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xiaowen ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate different radiomics models based on single phase and the different phase combinations of radiomics features from 3D tri-phasic CT to distinguish RO from chRCC.

methodsA total of 96 patients (30 RO and 66 chRCC) were enrolled in this study. Radiomics features were extracted from unenhanced phase (UP), corticomedullary phase (CMP), and nephrographic phase (NP) CT images. Feature selection was based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (LASSO) method. The selected features were used to develop different radiomics models using logistic regression (LR) analysis, including model 1 (UP), model 2(CMP), model 3(NP), model 4(UP+CMP), model 5(UP+NP), model 6(CMP+NP), and model 7(UP+CMP+NP). The radiomics model demonstrating the highest discrimination performance was utilized to construct the combined model (model 8) with clinical factors. A nomogram based on the model 8 was established. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the different models, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used. Delong's test was utilized to assess the statistical significance of the AUC improvement across the models.

resultsAmong the seven radiomics models, model 7 exhibited the highest AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.69, 0.99), and model 7 demonstrated a significantly superior AUC compared to the other radiomics models (all P < 0.05). The AUC values of radiomics models based on two phases (model4, mode5, mode6) were greater than the models based on single phase (model1, mode2, mode3) (all P < 0.05). Model 3 illustrated the best performance of the three radiomics models based on single phase with an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.57, 099). Model 6 illustrated the best performance of the three radiomics models based on two-phases combination with an AUC of 0.83 (0.66, 0.99). Model 8 achieved an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.83, 1.00) which is higher than those all radiomics models.

conclusionRadiomics models based on combination of radiomics features from UP, CMP, and NP can be a useful and promising technique to differentiate RO from chRCC. Moreover, the model combining clinical factors and radiomics features showed better classification performance to distinguish them.

Indexed as

Adenoma, OxyphilicCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedChromophobe renal cell carcinomaComputed tomographyDifferential diagnosisRadiomicsRenal oncocytoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.