ArticleScientific reports2023
Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of machine learning algorithms for mortality risk, readmission and phenotype prediction in patients with heart failure: exploring key data sources, input variables and outcomes.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Cardiology hospital admission risk prediction: training, internal validation and technical implementation in the electronic health record.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Prognostic Modeling of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Outcomes Using Machine Learning-Based Survival Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development and external validation of an explainable machine learning model for in-hospital mortality risk stratification in intensive care unit patients with heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Interpretation of Machine Learning Models for Short-Term Functional Recovery and 90-Day Readmission in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Digital therapeutics into geriatric cardiovascular emergency care.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Machine learning to identify heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive Performance of Machine Learning Models for Heart Failure Readmission: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Radiomics early assessment of post chemotherapy cardiotoxicity in cancer patients using 2D echocardiography imaging an interpretable machine learning study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive Modeling of Heart Failure Outcomes Using ECG Monitoring Indicators and Machine Learning.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based survival models for predicting rehospitalization of older hip fracture patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an integrated prognostic model for all-cause mortality in heart failure: a comprehensive analysis combining clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic parameters.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- ELTIRADS framework for thyroid nodule classification integrating elastography, TIRADS, and radiomics with interpretable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multimodal deep learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients using longitudinal chest X-rays and electronic health records.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based model for worsening heart failure risk in Chinese chronic heart failure patients.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- The risk prediction model for acute urine retention after perineal prostate biopsy based on the LASSO approach and Boruta feature selection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Enhancing Clinical Decision Making by Predicting Readmission Risk in Patients With Heart Failure Using Machine Learning: Predictive Model Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Machine learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with heart failure combined with hypertension: a multicenter retrospective study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study intends to predict in-hospital and 6-month mortality, as well as 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission, using Machine Learning (ML) approach via conventional features. A total of 737 patients remained after applying the exclusion criteria to 1101 heart failure patients. Thirty-four conventional features were collected for each patient. First, the data were divided into train and test cohorts with a 70-30% ratio. Then train data were normalized using the Z-score method, and its mean and standard deviation were applied to the test data. Subsequently, Boruta, RFE, and MRMR feature selection methods were utilized to select more important features in the training set. In the next step, eight ML approaches were used for modeling. Next, hyperparameters were optimized using tenfold cross-validation and grid search in the train dataset. All model development steps (normalization, feature selection, and hyperparameter optimization) were performed on a train set without touching the hold-out test set. Then, bootstrapping was done 1000 times on the hold-out test data. Finally, the obtained results were evaluated using four metrics: area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), specificity (SPE), and sensitivity (SEN). The RFE-LR (AUC: 0.91, ACC: 0.84, SPE: 0.84, SEN: 0.83) and Boruta-LR (AUC: 0.90, ACC: 0.85, SPE: 0.85, SEN: 0.83) models generated the best results in terms of in-hospital mortality. In terms of 30-day rehospitalization, Boruta-SVM (AUC: 0.73, ACC: 0.81, SPE: 0.85, SEN: 0.50) and MRMR-LR (AUC: 0.71, ACC: 0.68, SPE: 0.69, SEN: 0.63) models performed the best. The best model for 3-month rehospitalization was MRMR-KNN (AUC: 0.60, ACC: 0.63, SPE: 0.66, SEN: 0.53) and regarding 6-month mortality, the MRMR-LR (AUC: 0.61, ACC: 0.63, SPE: 0.44, SEN: 0.66) and MRMR-NB (AUC: 0.59, ACC: 0.61, SPE: 0.48, SEN: 0.63) models outperformed the others. Reliable models were developed in 30-day rehospitalization and in-hospital mortality using conventional features and ML techniques. Such models can effectively personalize treatment, decision-making, and wiser budget allocation. Obtained results in 3-month rehospitalization and 6-month mortality endpoints were not astonishing and further experiments with additional information are needed to fetch promising results in these endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.