Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907665›Full record

SynthesisAging clinical and experimental research2023

Exploring concepts and trends in informal caregiver burden: systematic review using citation network and content analysis.

Shuo-Chen Chien, Yu-Hung Chang, Chia-Ming Yen, Djeane Debora Onthoni, I-Chien Wu, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Hung-Yi Chiou, Ren-Hua Chung

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuo-Chen ChienInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, 350, Taiwan.
Yu-Hung ChangInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, 350, Taiwan.
Chia-Ming YenNational Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research, National Health Research Institutes, Yunlin County, 632, Taiwan.
Djeane Debora OnthoniInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, 350, Taiwan.
I-Chien WuInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, 350, Taiwan.
Chih-Cheng HsuInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, 350, Taiwan.
Hung-Yi ChiouInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, 350, Taiwan.
Ren-Hua ChungInstitute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli County, 350, Taiwan. rchung@nhri.edu.tw.
National Health Research Institutes · TWTaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

National Health Research Institutes PH-111-GP-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the increase in the aging population, informal caregivers have become an essential pillar for the long-term care of older individuals. However, providing care can have a negative impact and increase the burden on caregivers, which is a cause for concern.

objectiveThis study aimed to comprehensively depict the concept of "informal caregiver burden" through bibliometric and content analyses.

methodsWe searched the Web of Science (WoS) database to obtain bibliometric data and included only papers published between 2013 and 2022. We used content analysis to extract and identify the core concepts within the text systematically.

resultsAltogether, 934 papers were included in the bibliometric analysis, from which we selected 19 highly impactful papers for content analysis. The results indicate that researchers have focused on exploring the factors that impact informal caregiver burden. Meanwhile, there has been a widespread discussion regarding the caregiver burden among those caring for recipients with specific illnesses, such as dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer, as these illnesses can contribute to varying levels of burden on informal caregivers. In addition, questionnaires and interviews emerged as the predominant methods for data collection in the realm of informal caregiver research. Furthermore, we identified 26 distinct assessment tools specifically tailored for evaluating burden, such as caregiver strain index (CSI).

conclusionFor future studies, we suggest considering the intersectionality of factors contributing to the burden on informal caregivers. This approach could enhance the well-being of both caregivers and older care recipients.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCaregiversAgedAgingCaregiver BurdenHumansQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesAging populationBibliometric analysisContent analysisHealth careInformal caregiver burdenLong-term carePatients

Identifiers

PMID37907665
OpenAlexW4388135300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.