Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907640›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2023

Mutual generation in neuronal activity across the brain via deep neural approach, and its network interpretation.

Ryota Nakajima, Arata Shirakami, Hayato Tsumura, Kouki Matsuda, Eita Nakamura, Masanori Shimono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Neural network embedding of functional microconnectome.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryota NakajimaKyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Arata ShirakamiKyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hayato TsumuraKyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kouki MatsudaKyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Eita NakamuraKyoto University, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto, Japan.
Masanori ShimonoKyoto University, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. m-shimono@ist.osaka-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-3549-7697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the brain, many regions work in a network-like association, yet it is not known how durable these associations are in terms of activity and could survive without structural connections. To assess the association or similarity between brain regions with a generating approach, this study evaluated the similarity of activities of neurons within each region after disconnecting between regions. The "generation" approach here refers to using a multi-layer LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) model to learn the rules of activity generation in one region and then apply that knowledge to generate activity in other regions. Surprisingly, the results revealed that activity generation from one region to disconnected regions was possible with similar accuracy to generation between the same regions in many cases. Notably, firing rates and synchronization of firing between neuron pairs, often used as neuronal representations, could be reproduced with precision. Additionally, accuracies were associated with the relative angle between brain regions and the strength of the structural connections that initially connected them. This outcome enables us to look into trends governing non-uniformity of the cortex based on the potential to generate informative data and reduces the need for animal experiments.

Indexed as

BrainNeuronsAnimalsCerebral CortexLearning

Identifiers

PMID37907640
PMCPMC10618281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.