Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907595›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2023

Combination of genomic instability score and TP53 status for prognosis prediction in lung adenocarcinoma.

Juan Feng, Yang Lan, Feng Liu, Ye Yuan, Jia Ge, Sen Wei, Hu Luo, Jianjun Li, Tao Luo, Xiuwu Bian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07303218 (The HER Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07303218 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The HER Project: Homologous Recombination Deficiency in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC, a Retrospective and Prospective Translational Single-center Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2025 to 2032Enrolled100ConditionsEGFR, Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, Homologous Recombination Deficiency, PARP InhibitorArmsNo Intervention: Observational Cohort
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Precision clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan FengInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, 400038, Chongqing, China.
Yang LanInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, 400038, Chongqing, China.
Feng LiuInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, 400038, Chongqing, China.
Ye YuanInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, 400038, Chongqing, China.
Jia GeInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, 400038, Chongqing, China.
Sen WeiInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, 400038, Chongqing, China.
Hu LuoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 400038, Chongqing, China.
Jianjun LiDepartment of Oncology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), 400038, Chongqing, China.
Tao LuoInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, 400038, Chongqing, China. lty3169@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9979-6587
Xiuwu BianInstitute of Pathology and Southwest Cancer Center, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) and Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunopathology, Ministry of Education of China, 400038, Chongqing, China. bianxiuwu@263.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4383-0197
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomic instability (GI) /homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, calculated as the sum of the events of loss of heterozygosity (LOH), large-scale state transition (LST) and telomere allele imbalance (TAI), is used to guide the choice of treatment in several cancers, but its relationship with genomic features, clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in lung cancer is poorly understood, which could lead to population bias in prospective studies. We retrospectively analyzed 1011 lung cancer patients whose tumor samples were successfully profiled by high-throughput sequencing panel including GI/HRD score. Alterations of many cancer suppressor genes were associated with higher GI/HRD scores, biallelic inactivation of TP53 was correlated with a high GI/HRD score. A combination of two gene alterations exhibited a higher GI/HRD scores than single gene alterations. The GI/HRD score was associated with advanced stages in lung adenocarcinoma but not in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, patients with higher GI/HRD scores had significantly shorter overall survival and progression-free survival than patients with lower GI/HRD scores. Finally, patients with a combination of a higher GI/HRD scores and TP53 alteration exhibited an extremely poor prognosis compared with patients with a lower GI/HRD scores and wild-type TP53 (overall survival, training cohort, hazard ratio (HR) = 8.56, P < 0.001; validation cohort, HR = 6.47, P < 0.001; progression-free survival, HR = 4.76, P < 0.001). Our study revealed the prognostic value of the GI/HRD score in lung adenocarcinoma, but not for all lung cancer. Moreover, the combination of the GI/HRD score and TP53 status could be a promising strategy to predict the prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

Identifiers

PMID37907595
PMCPMC10618567
OpenAlexW4388047923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.