ArticleScientific reports2023
Comparison of chloroplast genomes and phylogenetic analysis of four species in Quercus section Cyclobalanopsis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparative and evolutionary analysis of chloroplast genomes from five rare Styrax species.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Identification of heterophyllin B accumulation associated genes via WGCNA inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- New insights on the phylogeny, evolutionary history, and ecological adaptation mechanism in cycle-cup oaks based on chloroplast genomes.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Comparative Phylogenetic Analysis of Ancient Korean Tea "Hadong Cheon-Nyeon Cha (Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Comparative and phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast genomes from ten species inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification in Quercus L. species was considered to be difficult all the time. The fundamental phylogenies of Quercus have already been discussed by morphological and molecular means. However, the morphological characteristics of some Quercus groups may not be consistent with the molecular results (such as the group Helferiana), which may lead to blurring of species relationships and prevent further evolutionary researches. To understand the interspecific relationships and phylogenetic positions, we sequenced and assembled the CPGs (160,715 bp-160842 bp) of four Quercus section Cyclobalanopsis species by Illumina pair-end sequencing. The genomic structure, GC content, and IR/SC boundaries exhibited significant conservatism. Six highly variable hotspots were detected in comparison analysis, among which rpoC1, clpP and ycf1 could be used as molecular markers. Besides, two genes (petA, ycf2) were detected to be under positive selection pressure. The phylogenetic analysis showed: Trigonobalanus genus and Fagus genus located at the base of the phylogeny tree; The Quercus genus species were distincted to two clades, including five sections. All Compound Trichome Base species clustered into a single branch, which was in accordance with the results of the morphological studies. But neither of group Gilva nor group Helferiana had formed a monophyly. Six Compound Trichome Base species gathered together in pairs to form three branch respectively (Quercus kerrii and Quercus chungii; Quercus austrocochinchinensis with Quercus gilva; Quercus helferiana and Quercus rex). Due to a low support rate (0.338) in the phylogeny tree, the interspecies relationship between the two branches differentiated by this node remained unclear. We believe that Q. helferiana and Q. kerrii can exist as independent species due to their distance in the phylogeny tree. Our study provided genetic information in Quercus genus, which could be applied to further studies in taxonomy and phylogenetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.