ArticleGenome research2023
Multiscale network modeling reveals the gene regulatory landscape driving cancer prognosis in 32 cancer types.
Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integration of single-cell regulon atlas and bulk RNA-seq for individualized prognostic prediction in stomach adenocarcinoma.iScience · 2026Article
- Review
- Transcriptomic and Multi-scale Network Analyses Reveal Key Drivers of Cardiovascular Disease.IEEE transactions on molecular, biological, and multi-scale communications · 2025Article
- Functional genomic imaging (FGI), a virtual tool for visualization of functional gene expression modules in heterogeneous tumor samples.Biology direct · 2025Article
- Integration of transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of TFEB reveals its dual functional roles in Pan-cancer.NAR cancer · 2024Article
- Mechanisms and technologies in cancer epigenetics.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is a complex disease with diverse molecular mechanisms that affect patient prognosis. Network-based approaches are effective in revealing a holistic picture of cancer prognosis and gene interactions. However, a comprehensive landscape of coexpression networks and prognostic gene modules across multiple cancer types remains elusive. In this study, we performed a systematic analysis of coexpression networks in 32 cancer types. Our analysis identified 4749 prognostic modules that play a vital role in regulating cancer progression. Integrative epigenomic analyses revealed that these modules were regulated by interactions between gene expression and methylation. Coregulated genes of network modules were enriched in chromosome cytobands and preferentially localized in open chromatin regions. The preserved network modules formed 330 module clusters that resided in chromosome hot spots. The cancer-type-specific prognostic modules participated in unique essential biological processes in different cancer types. Overall, our study provides rich resources of prevalent gene networks and underlying multiscale regulatory mechanisms driving cancer prognosis, which lay a foundation for biomarker discovery and therapeutic target development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.