Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907296›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Implementation model for a national learning health system (IMPLEMENT-National LHS): a concept analysis and systematic review protocol.

Jean-Baptiste Gartner, Boutheina Benharbit, Géraldine Layani, Maxime Sasseville, Célia Lemaire, Frédéric Bergeron, Catherine Wilhelmy, Matthew Menear, André Côté

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jean-Baptiste GartnerDépartement de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada jean-baptiste.gartner.1@ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-6112
Boutheina BenharbitCentre de recherche en gestion des services de santé, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-9392-8374
Géraldine LayaniDépartement de Médecine de famille et médecine d'urgence, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1764-6433
Maxime SassevilleVITAM, Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1694-1414
Célia LemaireDépartement de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4576-0516
Frédéric BergeronBibliothèque-Direction des services-conseils, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Catherine WilhelmyCentre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Matthew MenearVITAM, Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
André CôtéDépartement de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite efforts and repeated calls to improve the organisation and quality of healthcare and services, and in view of the many challenges facing health systems, the results and capacity to adapt and integrate innovations and new knowledge remain suboptimal. Learning health systems (LHS) may be an effective model to accelerate the application of research for real quality improvement in healthcare. However, while recognising the enormous potential of LHS, the literature suggests the model remains more of an aspiration than a reality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To reach a fine understanding of the implementation of the concepts involved in LHS, we will use a hybrid method which combines concept analyses with systematic review methodology. We will use a two-step analysis, a content analysis to analyse the definitions, uses and attributes of the concept and a systematic review to analyse the concept's implementation mechanisms. We will search eight databases and grey literature and present a broad synthesis of the available evidence regarding design, implementation and evaluation of LHS in a multilevel perspective. We will follow the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement for conducting and reporting a systematic review. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts against the eligibility criteria followed by full-text screening of potentially relevant articles for final inclusion decision. Conflicts will be resolved with a senior author. We will include published primary studies that use qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods. The assessment of risk of bias will be made using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review is exempt from ethics approval. The results formulated will highlight evidence-based interventions that support the implementation of a national LHS. They will be of particular interest to decision makers, researchers, managers, clinicians and patients allowing finally to implement the promising proposal of LHSs at national scale. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023393565.

Indexed as

Learning Health SystemDelivery of Health CareGray LiteratureHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicQuality ImprovementResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topichealth policyorganisation of health servicesquality in health caresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37907296
PMCPMC10619008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.