Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37907257›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Feature-Specific Salience Maps in Human Cortex.

Daniel D Thayer, Thomas C Sprague

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07572630 (Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07572630 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition: Expt 2.2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRan2026 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsBasic Science: Visual Attention in Healthy Participants, Basic Science: Neural Representations of LocationArmsStimulus properties: task-defining feature
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Division and spreading of attention across color.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  8. Topographical Representation of Saliency in the Human Visual and Temporo-occipital Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel D ThayerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 danielthayer@ucsb.edu tsprague@ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0053-4243
Thomas C SpragueDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106 danielthayer@ucsb.edu tsprague@ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-2463

Funding

Probing the role of feature dimension maps in visual cognitionR01EY035300 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI THOMAS C SPRAGUE · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY035300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Priority map theory is a leading framework for understanding how various aspects of stimulus displays and task demands guide visual attention. Per this theory, the visual system computes a priority map, which is a representation of visual space indexing the relative importance, or priority, of locations in the environment. Priority is computed based on both salience, defined based on image-computable properties; and relevance, defined by an individual's current goals, and is used to direct attention to the highest-priority locations for further processing. Computational theories suggest that priority maps identify salient locations based on individual feature dimensions (e.g., color, motion), which are integrated into an aggregate priority map. While widely accepted, a core assumption of this framework, the existence of independent feature dimension maps in visual cortex, remains untested. Here, we tested the hypothesis that retinotopic regions selective for specific feature dimensions (color or motion) in human cortex act as neural feature dimension maps, indexing salient locations based on their preferred feature. We used fMRI activation patterns to reconstruct spatial maps while male and female human participants viewed stimuli with salient regions defined by relative color or motion direction. Activation in reconstructed spatial maps was localized to the salient stimulus position in the display. Moreover, the strength of the stimulus representation was strongest in the ROI selective for the salience-defining feature. Together, these results suggest that feature-selective extrastriate visual regions highlight salient locations based on local feature contrast within their preferred feature dimensions, supporting their role as neural feature dimension maps.

Indexed as

Brain MappingVisual CortexFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVision, OcularVisual PerceptionfMRIpriority mapsaliencevisual system

Identifiers

PMID37907257
PMCPMC10727177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.