Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37906721›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2023

Effects of stochastic coding on olfactory discrimination in flies and mice.

Shyam Srinivasan, Simon Daste, Mehrab N Modi, Glenn C Turner, Alexander Fleischmann, Saket Navlakha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Projection-specific Routing of Odor Information in the Olfactory Cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Improved inference of latent neural states from calcium imaging data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A Perspective on Neuroscience Data Standardization with Neurodata Without Borders.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shyam SrinivasanKavli Institute for Brain and Mind, University of California, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8069-5628
Simon DasteDepartment of Neuroscience, Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Mehrab N ModiJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Glenn C TurnerJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Alexander FleischmannDepartment of Neuroscience, Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Saket NavlakhaSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States of America.
Allen Institute for Brain Science · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

The Structure of Olfactory Neural and Perceptual SpacesU19NS112953 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI RINBERG, DMITRY · 2019 to 2023
$18.4M
Multilevel Analysis of Neuronal Computations Underlying the Robust Encoding of Sensory Information in the Mammalian Olfactory SystemUF1NS111692 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ARENKIEL, BENJAMIN R, PFAFFINGER, PAUL · 2019 to 2019
$4.5M
Odor Memory Traces in the Mouse Olfactory Cortex - SupplementR01DC017437 · NIDCD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI FLEISCHMANN, ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
CRCNS: Common algorithmic strategies used by the brain for labeling points in high-dimensional spaceR01DC017695 · NIDCD · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI NAVLAKHA, SAKET · 2018 to 2020
$1.3M
Brain Science Compute ClusterS10OD025181 · OD · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JEROME N · 2019 to 2019
$600k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017437NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017695NIH HHS S10 OD025181NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS112953NINDS NIH HHS UF1 NS111692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sparse coding can improve discrimination of sensory stimuli by reducing overlap between their representations. Two factors, however, can offset sparse coding's benefits: similar sensory stimuli have significant overlap and responses vary across trials. To elucidate the effects of these 2 factors, we analyzed odor responses in the fly and mouse olfactory regions implicated in learning and discrimination-the mushroom body (MB) and the piriform cortex (PCx). We found that neuronal responses fall along a continuum from extremely reliable across trials to extremely variable or stochastic. Computationally, we show that the observed variability arises from noise within central circuits rather than sensory noise. We propose this coding scheme to be advantageous for coarse- and fine-odor discrimination. More reliable cells enable quick discrimination between dissimilar odors. For similar odors, however, these cells overlap and do not provide distinguishing information. By contrast, more unreliable cells are decorrelated for similar odors, providing distinguishing information, though these benefits only accrue with extended training with more trials. Overall, we have uncovered a conserved, stochastic coding scheme in vertebrates and invertebrates, and we identify a candidate mechanism, based on variability in a winner-take-all (WTA) inhibitory circuit, that improves discrimination with training.

Indexed as

DipteraOlfactory PerceptionAnimalsLearningMiceOdorantsOlfactory PathwaysSmell

Identifiers

PMID37906721
PMCPMC10618007
OpenAlexW4388039331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.