Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37906352›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023

Emerging markers of cancer cachexia and their relationship to sarcopenia.

Melanie Lipshitz, J Visser, R Anderson, D G Nel, T Smit, H C Steel, B Rapoport

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A health-system-scale, episode-resolved multimodal atlas of cancer cachexia.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Relationships of emerging biomarkers of cancer cachexia with quality of life, appetite, and cachexia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie LipshitzDivision of Human Nutrition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. melanielevydietician@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5867-7669
J VisserDivision of Human Nutrition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
R AndersonDepartment of Immunology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
D G NelCentre for Statistical Consultation, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
T SmitThe Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa.
H C SteelDepartment of Immunology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
B RapoportDepartment of Immunology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZAThe Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmerging biomarkers of cancer cachexia and their roles in sarcopenia and prognosis are poorly understood. Baseline assessments of anthropometrics, sarcopenia, cachexia status and biomarkers of cachexia were measured in patients with advanced cancer and healthy controls. Thereafter, relationships of the biomarkers with cachexia and sarcopenia were explored.

methodsA prospective case-control design was used, including 40 patients with advanced cancer and 40 gender, age-matched controls. Bioelectrical impedance [skeletal muscle index (SMI)] and hand dynamometry [hand grip strength (HGS)] assessed sarcopenia and a validated tool classified cancer cachexia. Albumin, lymphocyte and platelet counts, haemoglobin, C-reactive protein (CRP), pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and citrullinated histone H3 (H3Cit) were measured.

resultsPatients had significantly lower SMI (6.67 kg/m

conclusionSignificant relationships and differences of haemoglobin, CRP and albumin supports future use of these biomarkers in cancer cachexia. CXCL5 and H3Cit as valuable biomarkers in cancer cachexia remains to be defined.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSarcopeniaBiomarkersCachexiaC-Reactive ProteinHand StrengthHemoglobinsHumansMuscle, SkeletalBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinHemoglobinsBiomarkersCachexiaHand grip strengthSarcopeniaSkeletal muscle index

Identifiers

PMID37906352
PMCPMC10657295
OpenAlexW4388044100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.