Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37906304›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2023

Effects of different doses of ionizing radiation on alveolar bone repair in post-extraction tooth socket: an experimental study in rats.

Juliana Simeão Borges, Isabella Santos Paula, Nayara Teixeira de Araújo Reis, Ana Paula de Lima Oliveira, Carlos José Soares, Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira Soares

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juliana Simeão BorgesDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Isabella Santos PaulaDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nayara Teixeira de Araújo ReisDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Paula de Lima OliveiraDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Carlos José SoaresDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Priscilla Barbosa Ferreira SoaresDepartment of Periodontology and Implantology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. pbfsoares@yahoo.com.br.
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the dose-response effects of ionizing radiation (IR) on alveolar bone repair and bone strength after tooth extraction. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 32 male Wistar rats were used in the study, 28 animals were included in the final analysis, and n = 7 for each experimental group. Mandibular first molars were extracted. After 7 days, the animals were randomly divided into four groups according to single-dose irradiation: NIr, control group; Ir15, irradiated at 15 Gy; Ir20, irradiated at 20 Gy; and Ir30, irradiated at 30 Gy. The tooth extraction sites were subjected to micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), histological, histomorphometric, and biomechanical analyses 14 days after extraction. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05).

resultsMicro-CT analysis revealed that IR led to lower values of bone volume (BV, in mm

conclusionIR affects alveolar bone repair. A dose of 30 Gy reduced the bone healing process owing to a smaller amount of newly formed bone and a lower percentage of densely packed collagen. Therefore, a dose of 30 Gy can be used to successfully establish an animal model of an irradiated mandible that mimics the irradiated clinical conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radiotherapy can lead to severe side effects and tooth extraction is a major risk factor. A proper understanding of the pathological mechanisms of radiation in alveolar bone repair requires the establishment of a suitable animal model of clinical conditions.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingTooth SocketAnimalsCollagenMaleRatsRats, WistarTooth ExtractionX-Ray MicrotomographyCollagenAlveolar boneIonizing radiationTooth extractionX-ray microtomography

Identifiers

PMID37906304
OpenAlexW4388079255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.