ArticleClinical oral investigations2023
Improving accuracy of early dental carious lesions detection using deep learning-based automated method.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for binary dental caries diagnosis using intraoral images and dental radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Assessing the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Caries Detection and Clinical Decision-Making: A Scoping Review.Caries research · 2026Review
- The Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Pedodontics: A Scoping Review of Evidence-Based Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Caries lesions diagnosis with deep convolutional neural network in intraoral QLF images by handheld device.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of a convolutional neural network (CNN) in detecting healthy teeth and early carious lesions on occlusal surfaces and to assess the applicability of this deep learning algorithm as an auxiliary aid. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 2,481 posterior teeth (2,459 permanent and 22 deciduous teeth) with varying stages of carious lesions were classified according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS). After clinical evaluation, ICDAS 0 and 2 occlusal surfaces were photographed with a professional digital camera. VGG-19 was chosen as the CNN and the findings were compared with those of a reference examiner to evaluate its detection efficiency. To verify the effectiveness of the CNN as an auxiliary detection aid, three examiners (an undergraduate student (US), a newly graduated dental surgeon (ND), and a specialist in pediatric dentistry (SP) assessed the acquired images (Phase I). In Phase II, the examiners reassessed the same images using the CNN-generated algorithms.
resultsThe training dataset consisted of 8,749 images, whereas the test dataset included 140 images. VGG-19 achieved an accuracy of 0.879, positive agreement of 0.827, precision of 0.949, negative agreement 0.800, and an F1-score of 0.887. In Phase I, the accuracy rates for examiners US, ND, and SP were 0.543, 0.771, and 0.807, respectively. In Phase II, the accuracy rates improved to 0.679, 0.886, and 0.857 for the respective examiners. The number of correct answers was significantly higher in Phase II than in Phase I for all examiners (McNemar test;P<0.05).
conclusionsVGG-19 demonstrated satisfactory performance in the detection of early carious lesions, as well as an auxiliary detection aid. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Automated detection using deep learning algorithms is an important aid in detecting early caries lesions and improves the accuracy of the disease detection, enabling quicker and more reliable clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37906303What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.