Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37906222›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Investigating Attraction and Retention of Staff Within Public Mental Health Services in Victoria, Australia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Kaitlyn Crocker, Inge Gnatt, Darren Haywood, Ravi Bhat, Ingrid Butterfield, Anoop Raveendran Nair Lalitha, Ruby Bishop, David J Castle, Zoe M Jenkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kaitlyn CrockerDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6352-0407
Inge GnattDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-8448
Darren HaywoodDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9317-4135
Ravi BhatDepartment of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, Shepparton, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-4037
Ingrid ButterfieldHER Centre Australia, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-8919
Anoop Raveendran Nair LalithaGrampians Mental Health & Wellbeing Services, Grampians Health, Ballarat, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4371-7792
Ruby BishopMercy Mental Health & Wellbeing Services, Mercy Health, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1445-2756
David J CastleSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3075-1580
Zoe M JenkinsDepartment of Mental Health, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8551-0792
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUBallarat Health Services · AUCabrini Hospital · AUGoulburn Valley Health · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large proportion of Australians are affected by mental illness each year, and treatment gaps are well known. To meet current and future demands and enable access to treatment that is safe, effective, and acceptable, a robust and sustainable mental health workforce is required. Factors reported to attract people to work within the mental health sector include aspiring to help others, having an interest in mental health and human behavior, the desire to make a difference and do something worthwhile, personal lived experience, recognition, and value of discipline-specific roles. However, despite the various reasons people enter the public mental health workforce, recruitment and retention continue to be ongoing challenges. To date, there has been limited investigation into understanding which factors are most relevant to the current Victorian workforce. Furthermore, a comparison to health care workers outside of mental health is also needed to better understand the specific needs of staff within the mental health sector.

objectiveThis study aims to explore factors related to attraction, recruitment, and retention of the public mental health workforce in Victoria, Australia.

methodsThe study is a multisite, mixed methods cross-sectional study to be conducted at 4 public hospital services within Victoria, Australia: 2 in metropolitan and 2 in regional or rural locations. Current, previous, and nonmental health workers will be asked to complete a 20-25-minute web-based survey, which is developed based on previous research and offered participation in an optional 30-60-minute semistructured interview to examine personal experiences and perceptions. Both aspects of the project will examine factors related to attraction, recruitment, and retention in the public mental health workforce. Differences between groups (ie, current, past, and nonmental health workers), as well as location, discipline, and health setting will be examined. Regression analyses will be performed to determine the factors most strongly associated with retention (ie, job satisfaction) and turnover intention. Qualitative data will be transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed to identify common themes.

resultsAs of May 2023, we enrolled 539 participants in the web-based survey and 27 participants in the qualitative interview.

conclusionsThis project seeks to build on current knowledge from within Australia and internationally to understand role and service/system-related issues of attraction, recruitment, and retention specifically within Victoria, Australia. Seeking up-to-date information from across the health workforce may provide factors specific to mental health by illuminating any differences between mental health workers and health care workers outside of mental health. Furthermore, exploring motivators across health care disciplines and locations to enter, stay in, or leave a role in public mental health settings will provide valuable information to support how the sector plans and develops strategies that are fit for purpose. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48855.

Indexed as

attractioncareer choicechallengeshirehiringHRhuman resourceshuman resourcingmental healthmental health personnelnew hireonboardingorientationpublic mental healthrecruitmentretention of staffretention, turnover intentionstaff retentionworkforce

Identifiers

PMID37906222
PMCPMC10646675
OpenAlexW4386690787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.