ArticleJAMA network open2023
Outcomes Following Early Postoperative Adjuvant Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing post-acute care inpatient rehabilitation for patients with brain metastasis: A systematic review of functional outcomes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Preoperative versus postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of long-term antihypertensive treatment on wound healing after major non-cardiac surgery in patients with cardiovascular diseases: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2024Pooled it
- Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy After Brain Metastasis Surgery: Mapping the Early Postoperative Pathway.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: do we treat patients or lesions?BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Care pathways for asymptomatic brain metastases: comparison of healthcare utilization, costs, and outcomes in outpatient versus acute settings.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- The evolving landscape of brain metastasis: volume II.Trends in cancer · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Article
- Tailored radiotherapy for brain metastases improves precision and outcomes.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Factors associated with local failure after stereotactic radiation to the surgical bed of patients with a single breast cancer metastasis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Survival Among Patients With ERBB2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer and Central Nervous System Disease.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Intracranial Outcomes of De Novo Brain Metastases Treated With Osimertinib Alone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed EGFR-Mutant NSCLC.JTO clinical and research reports · 2023Article
- Early experience and perioperative risk of GammaTile for upfront brain metastases: Report from a prospective multicenter study.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Consortium for Intracranial Metastasis Academic Research (CIMARa): Global interdisciplinary collaborations to improve outcomes of patient with brain metastases.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) enhances the local control of resected brain metastases (BrM). However, the risks of local failure (LF) and potential for posttreatment adverse radiation effects (PTRE) after early postoperative adjuvant SRS have not yet been established. Objective: To evaluate whether adjuvant SRS delivered within a median of 14 days after surgery is associated with improved LF without a concomitant increase in PTRE. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study examines a clinical workflow (RapidRT) that was implemented from 2019 to 2022 to deliver SRS to surgical patients within a median of 14 days, ensuring all patients were treated within 30 days postoperatively. This prospective cohort was compared with a historical cohort (StanRT) of patients with BrM resected between 2013 and 2019 to assess the association of the RapidRT workflow with LF and PTRE. The 2 cohorts were combined to identify optimal SRS timing, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years for survivors. Exposure: Timing of adjuvant SRS (14, 21, and 30 days postoperatively). Main Outcomes and Measures: LF and PTRE, according to modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases criteria. Results: There were 438 patients (265 [60.5%] female patients; 23 [5.3%] Asian, 27 [6.2%] Black, and 364 [83.1%] White patients) with a mean (SD) age of 62 (13) years; 377 were in the StanRT cohort and 61 in the RapidRT cohort. LF and PTRE rates at 1 year were not significantly different between RapidRT and StanRT cohorts. Timing of SRS was associated with radiographic PTRE. Patients receiving radiation within 14 days had the highest 1-year PTRE rate (18.08%; 95% CI, 8.31%-30.86%), and patients receiving radiation between 22 and 30 days had the lowest 1-year PTRE rate (4.10%; 95% CI, 1.52%-8.73%; P = .03). LF rates were highest for patients receiving radiation more than 30 days from surgery (10.65%; 95% CI, 6.90%-15.32%) but comparable for patients receiving radiation within 14 days, between 15 and 21 days, and between 22 and 30 days (≤14 days: 5.12%; 95% CI, 0.86%-15.60%; 15 to ≤21 days: 3.21%; 95% CI, 0.59%-9.99%; 22 to ≤30 days: 6.58%; 95% CI, 3.06%-11.94%; P = .20). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of adjuvant SRS timing following surgical resection of BrM, the optimal timing for adjuvant SRS appears to be within 22 to 30 days following surgery. The findings of this study suggest that this timing allows for a balanced approach that minimizes the risks associated with LF and PTRE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.