Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37905785›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2023

Risk factors and prevention of choking.

Sabina Saccomanno, Stefano Saran, Licia Coceani Paskay, Martina De Luca, Augusto Tricerri, Samuele Mafucci Orlandini, Francesca Greco, Giuseppe Messina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Choking and laryngospasm: Exploring commonalities and treatment strategies.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Sabina SaccomannoDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila. sabinasaccomanno@hotmail.it.
Stefano SaranDepartment of Human Sciences, Innovation and Territory, School of Dentistry, University of Insubria, Varese. ssaran@studenti.uninsubria.it.
Licia Coceani PaskayAcademy of Orofacial Myofunctional Therapy (AOMT), Pacific Palisades, CA. lpaskay@gmail.com.
Martina De LucaDental School, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy Rome. martina.deluca97@hotmail.com.
Augusto TricerriEmergency Medicine, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome. augusto.tricerri@aslroma1.it.
Samuele Mafucci OrlandiniUOC Surgical Digestive Endoscopy, Foundation Gemelli Polyclinic, Rome. samuele.mafucciorlandini@policlinicogemelli.it.
Francesca GrecoDepartment of Radiology, New San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno. francescagreco.1@alice.it.
Giuseppe MessinaDepartment of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of life of San Raffaele University Rome. giuseppe.messina17@unipa.it.
Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista · ITOspedale San Filippo Neri · ITOspedale San Giuseppe · ITPacific University Oregon · USUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choking (or foreign body airway obstruction) is a widespread phenomenon with serious consequences of morbidity and mortality. Choking (often also called suffocation) can be caused by food or inedible objects and leads to various degrees of asphyxiation or lack of oxygen in the blood stream. The incidence is very high in both young children and adults, especially seniors. However, since not all choking episodes end up in the emergency room or become fatalities, they often escape statistics. Although episodes of choking from non-edible bodies are infrequent, they affect mostly young children. Three of the most common risks for choking in general are neurological disorders, dysphagia and dental issues (few or no teeth, unstable or unsuitable prosthesis or orthodontic appliances).  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk factors of choking and ways to reduce/avoid this event. We reported data on a series of 138 patients admitted to the emergency department following a choking event, at a hospital in Rome, Italy. The age group of the analyzed population ranged from 1 to 88 years, with the most represented age group of these between 40 and 59, with a similar distribution between males and females. The types of foods on which people choked reflected the seasonal, traditional and local foods: 67% of patients reported choking on fish bones followed by meat bones (9%)  and artichokes (3%). Three relevant non-food choking elements reported were: orthodontic items, toothpicks and pins (one occurrence each). We also reported on two clinical cases of patients choking on meat and a chicken bone. In conclusion, choking awareness and prevention are essential for implementing potential life-saving precautions. Prevention is the first tool to reduce the occurrence of this event, therefore it is necessary to analyze the risk factors and educate the population to eliminate them. Proper chewing and oral manipulation are paramount functions in preventing choking, along with meal-time supervision if little children and elderly. Then, it behooves the healthcare professionals to disseminate knowledge.

Identifiers

PMID37905785
PMCPMC10811631
OpenAlexW4387972279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.