Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37905674›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

The efficacy of molecular targeted therapy and nivolumab therapy for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis using the Michinoku Japan urological cancer study group database.

Tomoyuki Koguchi, Sei Naito, Shingo Hatakeyama, Kazuyuki Numakura, Yumina Muto, Renpei Kato, Takahiro Kojima, Yoshihide Kawasaki, Kento Morozumi, Shuya Kandori and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Tomoyuki KoguchiDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-9045-9426
Sei NaitoDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6104-4344
Shingo HatakeyamaDepartment of Urology and Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0026-4079
Kazuyuki NumakuraDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Yumina MutoDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Renpei KatoDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6089-7620
Takahiro KojimaDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yoshihide KawasakiDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kento MorozumiDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shuya KandoriDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4621-8470
Sadafumi KawamuraDepartment of Urology, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, Tsukuba, Japan.
Akihiro ItoDepartment of Urology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tomonori HabuchiDepartment of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
Wataru ObaraDepartment of Urology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Iwate, Japan.
Chikara OhyamaDepartment of Urology and Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Norihiko TsuchiyaDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Yoshiyuki KojimaDepartment of Urology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Akita University · JPTohoku University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPFukushima Medical University · JPHirosaki University · JPIwate Medical University · JPYamagata University · JPMiyagi Prefectural Hospital Organization · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) in Japanese population.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, we compared the time to treatment failure (TTF) for molecular-targeted agents as first-line therapy, or nivolumab therapy as sequential therapy between ccRCC and nccRCC using the data of Japanese metastatic RCC patients registered in the Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group database.

resultsIn total, 511 cases of ccRCC and 77 cases of nccRCC were treated with pharmacotherapy. After excluding the patients who received cytokine therapy, chemotherapy, or others, there were 391 ccRCC patients and 60 nccRCC patients who were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and 7 ccRCC patients and 7 nccRCC patients who were treated with mammalian-target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORIs). In addition, 132 ccRCC patients and 16 nccRCC patients received nivolumab. There was no significant difference in IMDC risk classification before first-line therapy between ccRCC and nccRCC groups, or in each subgroup within the nccRCC group. TTF for TKIs (161 days, 95% CI: 75-212 days) and mTORIs (21 days, 95% CI: 9-31 days) didn't differ significantly between nccRCC and ccRCC groups (205 days, 95% CI: 174-243 days and 33 days, 95% CI: 8-113 days, respectively). TTF for TKIs was significantly longer than that for mTORIs in nccRCC group (p<0.01). There was no significant difference in TTF between the different TKIs in nccRCC group. In addition, no significant difference in TTF for nivolumab was seen between ccRCC and nccRCC groups.

conclusionsThe results showed that the efficacy of molecular-targeted agents as first-line therapy was similar oncological outcomes between metastatic nccRCC and ccRCC in Japanese patients. TKIs may be more effective than mTORIs in metastatic nccRCC patients. Nivolumab administration might also be as effective in nccRCC patients as in ccRCC patients in Japanese population.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansJapanMolecular Targeted TherapyNivolumabRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsNivolumabimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmune-oncologymolecular target therapynon clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37905674
PMCPMC10709721
OpenAlexW4388034109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.