Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37905659›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

A Novel Monochromatic Light to Detect Target Specimens Within Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine-needle Aspiration Biopsy Samples.

Kazuya Matsumoto, Masaru Ueki, Kunio Ichino, Takeshi Tsuka, Kazutake Uehara, Yohei Takeda, Takumi Onoyama, Soichiro Kawata, Hiroki Kurumi, Hiroki Koda and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kazuya MatsumotoDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan; matsumotokazuya@tottori-u.ac.jp.
Masaru UekiAdvanced Medicine, Innovation and Clinical Research Center, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Kunio IchinoDepartment of Information and Electronics, Graduate School of Engineering, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Takeshi TsukaDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Kazutake UeharaAdvanced Medicine, Innovation and Clinical Research Center, Tottori University Hospital, Yonago, Japan.
Yohei TakedaDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Takumi OnoyamaDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Soichiro KawataDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Hiroki KurumiDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Hiroki KodaDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Taro YamashitaDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Yoshiharu OkamotoDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Naoyuki YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Shigeo SasakiOrganization for Research Initiative and Promotion, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
Hajime IsomotoDivision of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
Tottori University · JPTottori University Hospital · JPNagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimEndoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNB) enhances the diagnostic capabilities of EUS by providing additional pathological samples. However, detecting the target specimens within the collected samples can be challenging. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal wavelength of light for detection of target specimens within EUS-FNB samples in an animal experiment. MATERIALS AND

methodsEUS-FNB pancreatic tissue samples were collected from a male beagle (weight, 10 kg), and the samples were illuminated with monochromatic light ranging from 430 to 700 nm in 5-nm intervals. The intensities of the target specimen and blood samples were analyzed using the densitometry of the images obtained through irradiation.

resultsWe found that transmitted monochromatic light of 605 nm most vividly enhanced the contrast between the target specimens and blood in the samples in the impression of appearance.

conclusionThus, microscopical observations under transmitted light of 605 nm are optimal for target tissue identification within EUS-FNB samples.

Indexed as

EndosonographyPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsDogsEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationEndoscopyMaleEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirationlight microscopypancreasrapid on-site evaluation

Identifiers

PMID37905659
PMCPMC10621425
OpenAlexW4388035597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.