ArticleActa orthopaedica2023
Adaptation of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 into Swedish.
Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Translation and Validation of the Canadian-French Version of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII 2.0-CF).Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Translation, cross-cultural validity and reliability of a Danish version of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0).Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) Score and the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 in a Polish Pediatric Population.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polish Validation and Language Adaptation of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Translated Version of the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Translation and Validation of the Spanish Version of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Translation, reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of Norwich Patellar Instability score and The Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument (BPII) 2.0 is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) designed specifically for patellofemoral instability. We translated and adapted the BPII 2.0 into Swedish and assessed its psychometric properties. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe BPII 2.0 was forward- and back-translated. Children aged 10-16 years with patellar dislocation and instability or recurrent dislocation were recruited. Children completed the Swedish BPII 2.0 and KOOS-Child during their initial visit (t0) and 1 week later (t1). Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the BPII 2.0 and KOOS-Child scores comparison. Pearson correlation coefficients examined concurrent validity of the Swedish BPII 2.0 subscales with KOOS-Child subscales.
results64 children (46 females), mean age 13.8 (10.0-16.3) years, participated. Time after patellar dislocation or surgery was 3-24 months. 55 patients (86%) returned the second BPII 2.0 and KOOS-Child after an average of 9 (5-22) days. There were no ceiling or floor effects for the total score of the new Swedish BPII 2.0 or for its subscales. BPII 2.0 demonstrated excellent internal consistency at t0 (ICC 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-0.97) and at t1 (ICC 0.97, CI 0.95-0.98), as well as excellent test-retest reliability (ICC 0.97, CI 0.96-0.98). Concurrent validity of the BPII 2.0 subscales with KOOS-Child subscales was moderate to strong (rho 0.40-0.88).
conclusionThe Swedish BPII 2.0 showed excellent internal consistency as well as excellent test-retest reliability and is a reliable and valid questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.