Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37905524›Full record

Trial reportJournal of endourology2024

Artificial Intelligence-Based Video Feedback to Improve Novice Performance on Robotic Suturing Skills: A Pilot Study.

Runzhuo Ma, Dani Kiyasseh, Jasper A Laca, Rafal Kocielnik, Elyssa Y Wong, Timothy N Chu, Steven Cen, Cherine H Yang, Istabraq S Dalieh, Taseen F Haque and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of endourology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Artificial intelligence in urology training Enhancing annotation, feedback, and evaluation in robotic, laparoscopic, and endoscopic surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Applications of artificial intelligence in urologic oncology.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Runzhuo MaCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dani KiyassehDepartment of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Jasper A LacaCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Rafal KocielnikDepartment of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Elyssa Y WongCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Timothy N ChuCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Steven CenRadiology Department, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Cherine H YangCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Istabraq S DaliehCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Taseen F HaqueCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mitch G GoldenbergCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Xiuzhen HuangCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Anima AnandkumarDepartment of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.
Andrew J HungCatherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation and Education, USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical CompetenceRobotic Surgical ProceduresSuture TechniquesAdultFeedbackFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsVideo Recordingartificial intelligenceeducationfeedbackroboticssuturing

Identifiers

PMID37905524
PMCPMC11947633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.