ArticleCureus2023
The Hook Effect: A Case Study of a Giant Invasive Prolactinoma With Falsely Low Serum Prolactin.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validated LC-MS/MS Methods for Quantification of AC02 and Porcine ACTHPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The current state of MRI-based radiomics in pituitary adenoma: promising but challenging.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prolactinomas are benign pituitary tumors also known as prolactin-secreting adenomas (PSA). These tumors cause excessive secretion of prolactin (hyperprolactinemia), a hormone responsible for lactation. Diagnosing hyperprolactinemia relies on measuring prolactin levels in the blood, and elevated serum levels of prolactin are typically indicative of prolactinoma. The hook effect occurs in immunological tests such as the prolactin level test. When the amount of prolactin present in the sample is too high and exceeds the binding capacity of the antibodies being used, the test result may indicate falsely low levels of prolactin, which is the hook effect. The present study describes the case of a male patient who presented with neck pain and difficulty swallowing. MRI revealed a giant (>40mm) extradural tumor affecting the clivus, anterior fossa, pterygopalatine, and bilateral infratemporal fossae as well as the petrous apex and bilateral cavernous sinuses. Endocrinological investigation yielded no specific abnormalities. An occipitocervical fixation (arthrodesis) was proposed with simultaneous extended endoscopic endonasal resection. Surgery succeeded in resecting a portion of the clival tumor and the anterior fossa. Measurement of prolactin levels several weeks post-surgery found them to be extremely high, confirming the hook effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.