Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37905275›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Ipsilateral Right Angular Pregnancy After a Laparoscopic Right Salpingo-Oophorectomy: A Case Report.

Genichiro To, Keisuke Kodama, Ichiro Onoyama, Hideaki Yahata, Kiyoko Kato

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Genichiro ToDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JPN.
Keisuke KodamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JPN.
Ichiro OnoyamaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JPN.
Hideaki YahataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JPN.
Kiyoko KatoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JPN.
Kyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It can be difficult to distinguish an interstitial pregnancy from an angular pregnancy because of the close proximity of the implantation sites. The difference in pregnancy outcomes between interstitial and angular pregnancies makes this distinction very important. A 39-year-old gravida 7 para 4 who had undergone a laparoscopic right salpingo-oophorectomy (RSO) one year ago and a pregnancy termination via dilation and curettage (D&C) three weeks ago was suspected to have a ruptured right interstitial or angular pregnancy. The patient underwent a laparoscopic total hysterectomy. The postoperative histologic diagnosis was an abortion of a right angular pregnancy. Indeed, it is essential to rule out an interstitial or angular pregnancy during adnexal surgery, even soon after elective abortion. Proper management of an angular pregnancy could prevent a fatal outcome following a rupture or massive hemorrhage.

Indexed as

angular pregnancyectopic pregnancyinterstitial pregnancyintrauterine pregnancylaparoscopic surgery in pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37905275
PMCPMC10613323
OpenAlexW4387178014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.