Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37905142›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Interactions between ploidy and resource availability shape clonal interference at initiation and recurrence of glioblastoma.

Zuzanna Nowicka, Frederika Rentzeperis, Richard Beck, Vural Tagal, Ana Forero Pinto, Elisa Scanu, Thomas Veith, Jackson Cole, Didem Ilter, William Dominguez Viqueira and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Zuzanna NowickaDepartment of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Frederika RentzeperisIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA.
Richard BeckDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Vural TagalDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ana Forero PintoDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Elisa ScanuQueen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Thomas VeithDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jackson ColeDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Didem IlterDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
William Dominguez ViqueiraDepartment of Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jamie K TeerBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Konstantin MaksinPoznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Stefano PasettoDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Mahmoud A AbdalahQuantitative Imagine Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Giada FiandacaDepartment of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Tento, Italy.
Sandhya PrabhakaranDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Andrew SchultzDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Maureiq OjwangDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Jill S Barnholtz-SloanCenter for Biomedical Informatics & Information Technology and Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joaquim M FarinhasDepartment of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ana P GomesDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Parag KatiraDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Noemi AndorDepartment of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMedical University of Lodz · PLNational Cancer Institute · USPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLQueen Mary University of London · GBSan Diego State University · USUniversity of South Florida · USUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

Characterizing cytotoxic therapy induced shifts in the cost-to-benefit ratio of high ploidyR37CA266727 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Noemi Andor · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
A framework to integrate live-cell imaging with single-cell sequencing and learn how cells adapt to new environmentsR03CA259873 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI ANDOR, NOEMI, HEISER, LAURA MADELINE · 2022 to 2023
$179k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA259873NCI NIH HHS R37 CA266727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive form of primary brain tumor. Complete surgical resection of GBM is almost impossible due to the infiltrative nature of the cancer. While no evidence for recent selection events have been found after diagnosis, the selective forces that govern gliomagenesis are strong, shaping the tumor's cell composition during the initial progression to malignancy with late consequences for invasiveness and therapy response. We present a mathematical model that simulates the growth and invasion of a glioma, given its ploidy level and the nature of its brain tissue micro-environment (TME), and use it to make inferences about GBM initiation and response to standard-of-care treatment. We approximate the spatial distribution of resource access in the TME through integration of in-silico modelling, multi-omics data and image analysis of primary and recurrent GBM. In the pre-malignant setting, our in-silico results suggest that low ploidy cancer cells are more resistant to starvation-induced cell death. In the malignant setting, between first and second surgery, simulated tumors with different ploidy compositions progressed at different rates. Whether higher ploidy predicted fast recurrence, however, depended on the TME. Historical data supports this dependence on TME resources, as shown by a significant correlation between the median glucose uptake rates in human tissues and the median ploidy of cancer types that arise in the respective tissues (Spearman r = -0.70; P = 0.026). Taken together our findings suggest that availability of metabolic substrates in the TME drives different cell fate decisions for cancer cells with different ploidy and shapes GBM disease initiation and relapse characteristics.

Identifiers

PMID37905142
PMCPMC10614845
OpenAlexW4387808227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.