ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Continuous Tracking using Deep Learning-based Decoding for Non-invasive Brain-Computer Interface.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) using electroencephalography (EEG) provide a non-invasive method for users to interact with external devices without the need for muscle activation. While noninvasive BCIs have the potential to improve the quality of lives of healthy and motor impaired individuals, they currently have limited applications due to inconsistent performance and low degrees of freedom. In this study, we use deep learning (DL)-based decoders for online Continuous Pursuit (CP), a complex BCI task requiring the user to track an object in two-dimensional space. We developed a labeling system to use CP data for supervised learning, trained DL-based decoders based on two architectures, including a newly proposed adaptation of the PointNet architecture, and evaluated the performance over several online sessions. We rigorously evaluated the DL-based decoders in a total of 28 human participants, and found that the DL-based models improved throughout the sessions as more training data became available and significantly outperformed a traditional BCI decoder by the last session. We also performed additional experiments to test an implementation of transfer learning by pre-training models on data from other subjects, and mid-session training to reduce inter-session variability. The results from these experiments showed that pre-training did not significantly improve performance, but updating the models mid-session may have some benefit. Overall, these findings support the use of DL-based decoders for improving BCI performance in complex tasks like CP, which can expand the potential applications of BCI devices and help improve the quality of lives of healthy and motor-impaired individuals. Significance Statement: Brain-computer Interfaces (BCI) have the potential to replace or restore motor functions for patients and can benefit the general population by providing a direct link of the brain with robotics or other devices. In this work, we developed a paradigm using deep learning (DL)-based decoders for continuous control of a BCI system and demonstrated its capabilities through extensive online experiments. We also investigate how DL performance is affected by varying amounts of training data and collected more than 150 hours of BCI data that can be used to train new models. The results of this study provide valuable information for developing future DL-based BCI decoders which can improve performance and help bring BCIs closer to practical applications and wide-spread use.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.