ArticleMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany)2023
Modelling and correcting the impact of RF pulses for continuous monitoring of hyperpolarized NMR.
Article in Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- From equilibrium to dynamic metabolic imaging: the evolving role of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in neurodegenerative disorders.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Comparing low-field cryogenic nuclear relaxation of hyperpolarized diamond and silicon particles.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Temperature-Dependent Dynamic Nuclear Polarization of Diamond.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025Article
- Two-electron two-nucleus effective Hamiltonian and the spin diffusion barrier.Science advances · 2025Article
- Controlled synthesis and characterization of porous silicon nanoparticles for dynamic nuclear polarization.Nanoscale · 2024Article
- Relaxation enhancement by microwave irradiation may limit dynamic nuclear polarization.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring the build-up or decay of hyperpolarization in nuclear magnetic resonance requires radio-frequency (RF) pulses to generate observable nuclear magnetization. However, the pulses also lead to a depletion of the polarization and, thus, alter the spin dynamics. To simulate the effects of RF pulses on the polarization build-up and decay, we propose a first-order rate-equation model describing the dynamics of the hyperpolarization process through a single source and a relaxation term. The model offers a direct interpretation of the measured steady-state polarization and build-up time constant. Furthermore, the rate-equation model is used to study three different methods to correct the errors introduced by RF pulses: (i) a
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.