ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Left atrium 4D-flow segmentation with high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cellular Mechanisms Underlying Endothelial and Histopathological Alterations Induced by Cerebral Angiography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) leads to intracardiac thrombus and an associated risk of stroke. Phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with flow-encoding in all three spatial directions (4D-flow) provides a time-resolved 3D volume image with 3D blood velocity, which brings individual hemodynamic information affecting thrombus formation. As the resolution and contrast of 4D-flow are limited, we proposed a semi-automated 4D-flow segmentation method for the left atrium (LA) using a standard-of-care contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and registration technique. Methods: LA of 54 patients with AF were segmented from 4D-flow taken in sinus rhythm using two segmentation methods. (1) Phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (PC-MRA) was calculated from 4D-flow, and LA was segmented slice-by-slice manually. (2) LA and other structures were segmented from CE-MRA and transformed into 4D-flow coordinates by registration with the mutual information method. Overlap of volume was tested by the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the average symmetric surface distance (ASSD). Mean velocity and stasis were calculated to compare the functional property of LA from two segmentation methods. Results: LA volumes from segmentation on CE-MRA were strongly correlated with PC-MRA volume, although mean CE-MRA volumes were about 10% larger. The proposed registration scheme resulted in visually successful registration in 76% of cases after two rounds of registration. The mean of DSC of the registered cases was 0.770 ± 0.045, and the mean of ASSD was 2.704 mm ± 0.668 mm. Mean velocity had no significant difference between the two segmentation methods, and mean stasis had a 3.3% difference. Conclusion: The proposed CE-MRA segmentation and registration method can generate segmentation for 4D-flow images. This method will facilitate 4D-flow analysis for AF patients by making segmentation easier and overcoming the limit of resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.