ArticleMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany)2023
Non-perturbative treatment of the solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization.
Article in Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic nuclear polarization and chemically induced hyperpolarization: Progress, mechanisms, and opportunities.Magnetic resonance letters · 2025Review
- Article
- The solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization in liquids.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2023Article
- The solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization in liquids - accounting forMagnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the solid effect of dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), the concerted flips of the electronic and nuclear spins, which are needed for polarization transfer, are induced by the microwaves. Commonly, the effect of the microwaves is modeled by a rate process whose rate constant is determined perturbatively. According to quantum mechanics, however, the coherent microwave excitation leads to Rabi nutation, which corresponds to a rotation rather than a rate process. Here we reconcile the coherent effect of the microwaves with the description by rate equations by focusing only on the steady state of the spin dynamics. We show that the phenomenological rate constants describing the synchronous excitation of the electronic and nuclear spins can be selected such that the description by rate equations yields the same steady state as the exact quantum-mechanical treatment. The resulting non-perturbative rates differ from the classical, perturbative ones and remain valid also at the high microwave powers used in modern-day DNP. Our treatment of the solid effect highlights the role of the coherences in the mechanistic steps of polarization transfer and reveals the importance of the dispersive (i.e., out-of-phase) component of the EPR line. Interestingly, the multiplicative dependence of the DNP enhancement on the dispersive EPR component was intuited in the very first report of the solid effect in liquids . The time-domain description of the solid effect developed here is extendable to liquids, where the dipolar interaction changes randomly in time due to molecular diffusion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.