ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2024
Fabrication and In Vivo Assessment of Oxidatively Responsive PolyHIPE Scaffolds for Use in Diabetic Orthopedic Applications.
Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Advancements in Non-surgical Approaches for the Management of Delayed Union and Nonunion in Long Bone Fractures of the Extremities: A Review.Advances in therapy · 2026Review
- Biomaterials Designed to Modulate Reactive Oxygen Species for Enhanced Bone Regeneration in Diabetic Conditions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Achieving surgical success in orthopedic patients with metabolic disease remains a substantial challenge. Diabetic patients exhibit a unique tissue microenvironment consisting of high levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which promotes osteoclastic activity and leads to decreased bone healing. Alternative solutions, such as synthetic grafts, incorporating progenitor cells or growth factors, can be costly and have processing constraints. Previously, the potential for thiol-methacrylate networks to sequester ROS while possessing tunable mechanical properties and degradation rates has been demonstrated. In this study, the ability to fabricate thiol-methacrylate interconnected porous scaffolds using emulsion templating to create monoliths with an average porosity of 97.0% is reported. The average pore sizes of the scaffolds range from 27 to 656 µm. The scaffolds can sequester pathologic levels of ROS via hydrogen peroxide consumption and are not impacted by sterilization. Subcutaneous implantation shows no signs of acute toxicity. Finally, in a 6-week bilateral calvarial defect model in Zucker diabetic fatty rats, ROS scaffolds increase new bone volume by 66% over sham defects. Histologic analysis identifies woven bone infiltration throughout the scaffold and neovascularization. Overall, this study suggests that porous thiol-methacrylate scaffolds may improve healing for bone grafting applications where high levels of ROS hinder bone growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.