ArticleBMJ global health2021
Health systems strengthening to arrest the global disability burden: empirical development of prioritised components for a global strategy for improving musculoskeletal health.
Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of multimorbid degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Pathophysiology-guided biomarkers and therapeutics for precision trauma medicine in polytrauma with musculoskeletal injuries.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Rheumatoid arthritis burden in 129 low- and middle-income countries from 1990 to 2023.iScience · 2026Article
- Global research priorities for back pain, neck pain and osteoarthritis: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Biologics or surgery for moderate knee osteoarthritis? a patient-centered framework for short-term relief and long-term outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Review
- How direct access to physiotherapy reshapes GP gatekeeping for musculoskeletal care in primary care: an exploratory organisational typology across health systems.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Hidden in plain sight: the fourth UN High-Level Meeting on the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases and the Promotion of Mental Health and Well-being missed the mark on chronic pain and mobility impairment.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- The challenges and opportunities for equitable global access to medications for paediatric rheumatology in low-to middle-income countries: a review on behalf of the Paediatric Global Task Force for Musculoskeletal Health.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- The World Health Organization guideline for non-surgical management of chronic primary low back pain in adults: implications for equitable care and strengthening health systems globally.Global health research and policy · 2025Article
- Exploring research knowledge and interests among Argentinian orthopedic trauma surgeons: a survey-based study to implement strategic tools for curricular development GAIA (Group for Support of Argentine Research).European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Online osteoarthritis training programme for community-based clinicians: Mixed methods cohort study.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2025Article
- Blueprints for Change: Integrating Systems Thinking into Musculoskeletal Health Policy; A Response to Recent Commentaries.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- A consensus-based agreement on a definition of a process variable: findings from a New Zealand nominal group technique study.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- "All of these things interact, that's why it's such a wicked problem": Stakeholders' perspectives of what hinders low back pain care in Australia and how to improve it.Health research policy and systems · 2024Article
- Global Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Care: Perspectives Beyond the US.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024Review
- A quantitative comparison between the essential medicines for rheumatic diseases in children and young people in Africa and the WHO model list.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2024Article
- Stressful life events and low back pain in older men: A cross-sectional and prospective analysis using data from the MrOS study.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2024Article
- The educational pathway to Advanced Practice for the physiotherapist: Protocol for a systematic mixed studies review.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors at 20 institutions in 22 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite the profound burden of disease, a strategic global response to optimise musculoskeletal (MSK) health and guide national-level health systems strengthening priorities remains absent. Auspiced by the Global Alliance for Musculoskeletal Health (G-MUSC), we aimed to empirically derive requisite priorities and components of a strategic response to guide global and national-level action on MSK health.
methodsDesign: mixed-methods, three-phase design.Phase 1: qualitative study with international key informants (KIs), including patient representatives and people with lived experience. KIs characterised the contemporary landscape for MSK health and priorities for a global strategic response.Phase 2: scoping review of national health policies to identify contemporary MSK policy trends and foci.Phase 3: informed by phases 1-2, was a global eDelphi where multisectoral panellists rated and iterated a framework of priorities and detailed components/actions.
resultsPhase 1: 31 KIs representing 25 organisations were sampled from 20 countries (40% low and middle income (LMIC)). Inductively derived themes were used to construct a logic model to underpin latter phases, consisting of five guiding principles, eight strategic priority areas and seven accelerators for action.Phase 2: of the 165 documents identified, 41 (24.8%) from 22 countries (88% high-income countries) and 2 regions met the inclusion criteria. Eight overarching policy themes, supported by 47 subthemes, were derived, aligning closely with the logic model.Phase 3: 674 panellists from 72 countries (46% LMICs) participated in round 1 and 439 (65%) in round 2 of the eDelphi. Fifty-nine components were retained with 10 (17%) identified as essential for health systems. 97.6% and 94.8% agreed or strongly agreed the framework was valuable and credible, respectively, for health systems strengthening.
conclusionAn empirically derived framework, co-designed and strongly supported by multisectoral stakeholders, can now be used as a blueprint for global and country-level responses to improve MSK health and prioritise system strengthening initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.