Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37904324›Full record

ArticleHealth communication2024

The Basis of Patient Resistance to Opportunistic Discussions About Weight in Primary Care.

Madeleine Tremblett, Helena Webb, Sue Ziebland, Elizabeth Stokoe, Paul Aveyard, Charlotte Albury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health communication, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madeleine TremblettNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0002-0490-9938
Helena WebbSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham.
Sue ZieblandNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford.
Elizabeth StokoeDepartment of Psychological and Behavioural Science, The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Paul AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford.
Charlotte AlburyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/18/70/34003Medical Research Council MR/J000515/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinicians expect that talking to patients with obesity about potential/future weight loss will be a difficult conversation, especially if it is not the reason that a patient is seeking medical help. Despite this expectation, many governments ask clinicians to take every opportunity to talk to patients about weight to help manage increasing levels of obesity. Although this is recommended, little is known about what happens in consultations when clinicians opportunistically talk to patients about weight, and if the anticipated difficulties are reality. This paper examines displays of explicit patient resistance following opportunistic weight-loss conversations initiated by GPs. We analyzed audio recordings and transcribed them for conversation analysis. We focused on the precursors of explicit resistance displays during opportunistic weight loss discussions, the format of the resistance, and the ways it was managed by GPs. We found relatively few instances of explicit resistance displays. When it did occur, rather than be related to the opportunistic nature of the advice, or the topic of weight itself, resistance was nuanced and associated to the sensitivity of the GPs managing unknown patient levels of awareness of weight loss benefits, or prior efforts to lose weight. Clinicians tended not to challenge this resistance from patients, and we suggest this tactic may be acceptable to patients and help foster the long-term collaborative relationships needed to tackle obesity. Data are in British English.

Indexed as

ObesityPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareWeight LossAdultCommunicationFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleMiddle AgedTape Recording

Identifiers

PMID37904324
PMCPMC11404860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.