Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37904241›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2023

Efficacy of haloperidol to decrease the burden of delirium in adult critically ill patients: the EuRIDICE randomized clinical trial.

Lisa Smit, Arjen J C Slooter, John W Devlin, Zoran Trogrlic, Nicole G M Hunfeld, Robert Jan Osse, Huibert H Ponssen, Arjen J B W Brouwers, Jeannette F Schoonderbeek, Koen S Simons and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03628391 (Efficacy of Haloperidol to Decrease the Burden of Delirium in Adult Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03628391 phase3terminatednot on this map

Efficacy of Haloperidol to Decrease the Burden of Delirium in Adult Critically Ill Patients (EuRIDICE): a Prospective Randomised Multi-center Double-blind Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2018 to 2021Enrolled142ConditionsDelirium, Critical Illness, Intensive Care Psychosis, Cognitive ImpairmentArmsHaloperidol, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa SmitDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Room Ne-415, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arjen J C SlooterDepartments of Psychiatry, Intensive Care Medicine and UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
John W DevlinSchool of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, USA.
Zoran TrogrlicDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Room Ne-415, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole G M HunfeldDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Room Ne-415, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert Jan OsseDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Huibert H PonssenDepartment of Intensive Care, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Arjen J B W BrouwersDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeannette F SchoonderbeekDepartment of Intensive Care, Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Koen S SimonsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Mark van den BoogaardDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Judith A LensDepartment of Intensive Care, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
Dirk P BoerDepartment of Intensive Care, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik A M P J GommersDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Room Ne-415, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim J R RietdijkDepartment of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mathieu van der JagtDepartment of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Room Ne-415, PO BOX 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.vanderjagt@erasmusmc.nl.
EuRIDICE study group
Erasmus MC · NLAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLIJsselland Ziekenhuis · NLIkazia Ziekenhuis · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMaasstad Ziekenhuis · NLNortheastern University · USRadboud University Medical Center · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

ZonMw 848041001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of haloperidol as treatment for ICU delirium and related symptoms remains controversial despite two recent large controlled trials evaluating its efficacy and safety. We sought to determine whether haloperidol when compared to placebo in critically ill adults with delirium reduces days with delirium and coma and improves delirium-related sequelae.

methodsThis multi-center double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial at eight mixed medical-surgical Dutch ICUs included critically ill adults with delirium (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist ≥ 4 or a positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU) admitted between February 2018 and January 2020. Patients were randomized to intravenous haloperidol 2.5 mg or placebo every 8 h, titrated up to 5 mg every 8 h if delirium persisted until ICU discharge or up to 14 days. The primary outcome was ICU delirium- and coma-free days (DCFDs) within 14 days after randomization. Predefined secondary outcomes included the protocolized use of sedatives for agitation and related behaviors, patient-initiated extubation and invasive device removal, adverse drug associated events, mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, 28-day mortality, and long-term outcomes up to 1-year after randomization.

resultsThe trial was terminated prematurely for primary endpoint futility on DSMB advice after enrolment of 132 (65 haloperidol; 67 placebo) patients [mean age 64 (15) years, APACHE IV score 73.1 (33.9), male 68%]. Haloperidol did not increase DCFDs (adjusted RR 0.98 [95% CI 0.73-1.31], p = 0.87). Patients treated with haloperidol (vs. placebo) were less likely to receive benzodiazepines (adjusted OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.18-0.89], p = 0.02). Effect measures of other secondary outcomes related to agitation (use of open label haloperidol [OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.12-1.56)] and other antipsychotics [OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.29-1.32)], self-extubation or invasive device removal [OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.22-2.18)]) appeared consistently more favorable with haloperidol, but the confidence interval also included harm. Adverse drug events were not different. Long-term secondary outcomes (e.g., ICU recall and quality of life) warrant further study.

conclusionsHaloperidol does not reduce delirium in critically ill delirious adults. However, it may reduce rescue medication requirements and agitation-related events in delirious ICU patients warranting further evaluation.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT03628391), October 9, 2017.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDeliriumAdultAgedComaCritical IllnessFemaleHaloperidolHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeAntipsychotic AgentsHaloperidolAntipsychoticCritical careDeliriumHaloperidolRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37904241
PMCPMC10617114
OpenAlexW4388035673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.