ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023
KAMPNet: multi-source medical knowledge augmented medication prediction network with multi-level graph contrastive learning.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsPredicting medications is a crucial task in intelligent healthcare systems, aiding doctors in making informed decisions based on electronic medical records (EMR). However, medication prediction faces challenges due to complex relations within heterogeneous medical data. Existing studies primarily focus on the supervised mining of hierarchical relations between homogeneous codes in medical ontology graphs, such as diagnosis codes. Few studies consider the valuable relations, including synergistic relations between medications, concurrent relations between diseases, and therapeutic relations between medications and diseases from historical EMR. This limitation restricts prediction performance and application scenarios.
methodsTo address these limitations, we propose KAMPNet, a multi-sourced medical knowledge augmented medication prediction network. KAMPNet captures diverse relations between medical codes using a multi-level graph contrastive learning framework. Firstly, unsupervised graph contrastive learning with a graph attention network encoder captures implicit relations within homogeneous medical codes from the medical ontology graph, generating knowledge augmented medical code embedding vectors. Then, unsupervised graph contrastive learning with a weighted graph convolutional network encoder captures correlative relations between homogeneous or heterogeneous medical codes from the constructed medical codes relation graph, producing relation augmented medical code embedding vectors. Finally, the augmented medical code embedding vectors, along with supervised medical code embedding vectors, are fed into a sequential learning network to capture temporal relations of medical codes and predict medications for patients.
resultsExperimental results on the public MIMIC-III dataset demonstrate the superior performance of our KAMPNet model over several baseline models, as measured by Jaccard, F1 score, and PR-AUC for medication prediction.
conclusionsOur KAMPNet model can effectively capture the valuable relations between medical codes inherent in multi-sourced medical knowledge using the proposed multi-level graph contrastive learning framework. Moreover, The multi-channel sequence learning network facilitates capturing temporal relations between medical codes, enabling comprehensive patient representations for downstream tasks such as medication prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.