Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37904166›Full record

ArticleChinese medicine2023

Development and evaluation of short-form version of the Constitution in Chinese Medicine Questionnaire: study a new and best brief instrument of Chinese medicine for health management.

Ming-Hua Bai, Zhu-Qing Li, Huai-Yu Wang, Xiao-Li Ma, Zhong-Li Wang, Shi-Jun Li, Si-Ying Dong, Zi-Ling Zhang, Wen-Le Li, Shun-Qi Chen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ming-Hua Bai *National Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Zhu-Qing Li *National Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Huai-Yu WangNational Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Xiao-Li MaCollege of Nursing, Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, China.
Zhong-Li WangCollege of Nursing, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, 332000, China.
Shi-Jun LiPharmacy Department, The NO.5 Hospital of Baoding, Baoding, 071000, China.
Si-Ying DongNational Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Zi-Ling ZhangNational Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Wen-Le LiNational Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Shun-Qi ChenNational Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Yu-Yang CaiNational Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Xiao-Shan ZhaoSchool of Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Ji WangNational Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China. doctorwang2009@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-8220
Qi WangNational Institute of TCM, Constitution and Preventive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China. wangqi710@126.com.

Funding

the 2019 Basic Scientific Research Expenses Project of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine 2019-JYB-XS-031the Innovation Team and Talents Cultivation Program of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine ZYYCXTD-C-202001the national key R&D program of china 2020YFC2003100the national key R&D program of china 2020YFC2003101the national key R&D program of china 2020YFC2003103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore efficient instruments for body constitution identification are needed for clinical practice. We aimed to develop the short-form version of the Constitution in Chinese Medicine Questionnaire (CCMQ) and evaluate for health management.

methodsFirst, the short forms were developed through expert survey, classical test theory (CTT), and modern item response (IRT) based on the CCMQ. A combination of e-mail and manual methods was used in expert survey. Then, five indexes of CTT including criteria value-critical ratio, correlation coefficient, discrete tendency, internal consistency, and factor loading were used. And, IRT method was used through analyzing the discrimination and difficulty parameters of items. Second, the three top-ranked items of each constitution scale were selected for the simplified CCMQ, based on the three combined methods of different conditions and weights. Third, The psychometric properties such as completion time, validity (Construct, criterion, and divergent validity), and reliability (test-retest and internal consistency reliability) were evaluated. Finally, the diagnostic validity of the best short-form used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

resultsThree short-form editions were developed, and retained items 27, 23 and 27, which are named as WangQi nine body constitution questionnaire of Traditional Chinese Medicine (short-form) (SF-WQ9CCMQ)- A, B, and C, respectively. SF-WQ9CCMQ- A is showed the best psychometric property on Construct validity, Criterion validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency reliability. The diagnostic validity indicated that the area under the ROC curve was 0.928 (95%CI: 0.924-0.932) for the Gentleness constitution scale, and were 0.895-0.969 and 0.911-0.981 for unbalance constitution scales using the cut-off value of the original CCMQ as 40 ("yes" standard) and 30 ("tendency" standard), respectively.

conclusionsOur study successfully developed a well short-form which has good psychometric property, and excellent diagnostic validity consistent with the original. New and simplified instrument and opportunity are provided for body constitution identification, health management and primary care implementation.

Indexed as

Body constitutionConstitution in Chinese Medicine QuestionnaireDiagnostic validityPsychometric property evaluationShort-form

Identifiers

PMID37904166
PMCPMC10617149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.